Southern States Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Napier

Decision Date16 May 1918
Docket Number9213.
Citation96 S.E. 15,22 Ga.App. 361
PartiesSOUTHERN STATES FIRE & CASUALTY INS. CO. v. NAPIER.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

Where a policy of fire insurance, issued in favor of the owner of property, contains what is known as the "ordinary" or "open" mortgage clause, merely providing that loss, if any, shall be paid to a named mortgagee as his interest may appear, this stipulation is merely collateral to the principal undertaking in favor of the mortgagor, and the mortgagee becomes simply an appointee of the fund, with no greater rights than those of the assured under whom he must claim, and any breach of the terms of the contract of insurance which would cause a lapse as against the one assured will operate to avoid the policy as against the mortgagee. May on Insurance, § 379; 13 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law 202, 250; Cooley's Briefs on Insurance, vol. 2, pp. 1520 1521; Brecht v. Law Union & Crown Ins. Co., 160 F 399, 87 C.C.A. 351, 18 L.R.A. (N. S.) 197, and note; Gilman v. Commonwealth Insurance Co., 112 Me. 528 92 A. 721, L.R.A. 1915C, 758. Hence, where a policy of insurance written in the name of the mortgagor thus merely recognizes the mortgagee as the appointee of the fund, a conveyance by the former to the latter of the title to the property is in violation of any stipulations which may be expressed in the policy prohibiting change of ownership in the property insured. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Liddell Co., 130 Ga. 8, 13, 60 S.E. 104, 14 L.R.A. (N. S.) 168, 124 Am.St.Rep. 157; Boston Co-operative Bank v. American Central Insurance Co., 201 Mass. 350, 87 N.E. 594, 23 L.R.A. (N. S.) 1147, and note.

But where to the policy of insurance there is attached in favor of the mortgagee what is known as the "New York standard mortgagee clause," by the terms of which it is provided that the interest of the mortgagee shall not be invalidated by reason of any act or neglect on the part of the mortgagor, such an agreement operates as a separate and distinct contract of insurance upon the mortgagee's interest, and gives to the mortgagee such an independent status as might authorize a recovery by him on the policy even though the circumstances were such as would prevent a recovery by the mortgagor. 13 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, 205; Cooley's Briefs on Insurance, vol. 2, pp. 1228, 1525.

Where such a form of agreement in favor of the mortgagee provides also that the mortgagee shall notify the company of any change of ownership in the property which shall come to his knowledge, and that, if this is not done, the policy shall become void, the absolute conveyance of the property by the owner to one whose interest is not covered by the terms of the insurance, where the mortgagee has knowledge of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Equitable Fire Ins. Co v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1921
    ...policy of which the mortgagee is ignorant. In construing this form (New York standard) this court in Southern States Fire & Casualty Co. v. Napier, 22 Ga. App. 361, 362, 96 S. E. 15 (2), held that— "This agreement operates as a separate and distinct contract of insurance upon the mortgagee'......
  • Equitable Fire Ins. Co. v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1921
    ... ... writing." See N.W. National Insurance Co. v ... Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co., 20 Ga.App ... 507, 93 S.E. 157 (4-a), ... States Fire & Casualty Co. v. Napier, 22 Ga.App. 361, ... 362, 96 S.E. 15 (2), held that-- ... "This ... ...
  • Ætna Ins. Co. Of Hartford v. Mosely
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 1933
    ...13, 158 S. E. 457; Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. v. Southern States, etc., Co., 20 Ga. App. 506, 93 S. E. 157; Southern States, etc., Co. v. Napier, 22 Ga. App. 361, 96 S. E. 15. ...
  • Aetna Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn., v. Mosely
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 1933
    ... ... appear held notice to fire insurer of any claim held ... by named party, precluding ... signed by the insured, and which states in substance that ... "any action taken by the company in ... Home Ins. Co., 155 Cal ... 659, 102 P. 814, 18 Ann.Cas. 864, which is as follows: ... "The appellant relies upon ... 457; Northwestern ... Nat. Ins. Co. v. Southern ... 157; Southern States, etc., Co. v ... Napier ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT