Southern v. Mississippi State Hosp.
Decision Date | 11 September 2003 |
Docket Number | No. 2002-CP-01298-SCT.,2002-CP-01298-SCT. |
Citation | 853 So.2d 1212 |
Parties | Willie B. SOUTHERN, Jr. v. MISSISSIPPI STATE HOSPITAL, Paul Jackson, M.D. and Martha Murray, M.D. |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Appellant, pro se. Thomas T. Dunbar, Jackson, William C. Griffin, Gulfport, L. Abraham Rowe, Jr., Jackson, attorneys for appellees.
Before McRAE, P.J., EASLEY and GRAVES, JJ.
EASLEY, Justice, for the court.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
¶ 1. Willie B. Southern, Jr. (Southern) was committed by order of the Chancery Court of Hinds County on April 19, 1999, to the Mississippi State Hospital. The affidavit for commitment was brought by Gerald Jones of the Jackson Police Department, as a friend of the court, seeking treatment for Southern. The affidavit alleged that Southern was a possible danger to himself and others and that he had barricaded himself and his two children in a hotel room for a week despite pleas from family and others to come out. The special master's commitment order reflects that Southern was present at the hearing with his attorney.
¶ 2. On June 9, 2002, Southern filed suit against the Mississippi State Hospital at Whitfield in Rankin County and its staff physicians, Dr. Paul Jackson (Dr. Jackson) and Dr. Martha Murray (Dr. Murray), collectively known as the Hospital. The Hospital filed a joint motion to dismiss pursuant to M.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a valid claim upon which relief can be granted. In the motion to dismiss, the Hospital took the position that they were exempt from the liability pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a), Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(d) and Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(m). The Hospital in its motion to dismiss further set forth the defense that Southern's complaint had not been properly filed pursuant to the one-year statute of limitation under Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-11.
¶ 3. The trial court entered its order granting the Hospital's motion to dismiss. In its order of dismissal, the trial court stated:
The [c]ourt finds that the [p]laintiff, Southern, has alleged that he was defamed by the diagnosis of [b]ipolar [d]isorder but has not pled that it has been published to anyone nor has he pled a special harm as a result of a publication of the alleged defamatory diagnosis. Defamation is an intentional tort that would also be subject to the one-year statute of limitations under common law as well as the Mississippi Tort Claims Act. (Miss.Code Ann.§ 15-1-35 states— All actions for assault, assault and battery, maiming, false imprisonment ... and all actions for slanderous words concerning the person or title, for failure to employ, and for libels shall be commenced within one (1) year next after the cause of such action accrued and not after.). The [p]laintiff does not plead a publishing of the alleged defamation nor that he has suffered a special harm from the alleged defamation so the allegation of defamation is not properly pled and as a matter of law should be dismissed. King v. Miss. Power & Light, 244 Miss. 486, 142 So.2d 222, 225 (1962) ( ); McLemore v. McLemore, 163 So.2d[So.] 500 (Miss.1935) (Ultimate essential facts upon which cause of action or affirmative defense thereto is based must be averred but not the items of evidence by which ultimate essential facts are to be proved.).
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the [d]efendants' [m]otion for [d]ismissal is hereby granted.
DISCUSSION
¶ 4. On appeal, Southern presents a convoluted argument. It is impossible to fully follow Southern's accusations raised on appeal. However, most of Southern's assignments of error appear to be various alleged constitutional violations under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Southern further appears to attempt to reference 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in his brief citing "Right Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C.S. & [sic] 1883 & [sic] 1985 and 1986)." Southern raises these constitutional arguments for the first time on appeal. As such, these constitutional allegations are not properly before this Court. The role of an appellate court is not to be a fact finder but rather determine and apply the law to the facts determined by the trier of fact. In Bender v. North Meridian Mobile Home Park, 636 So.2d 385, 389 (Miss.1994) (citing Patterson v. State, 594 So.2d 606, 609 (Miss. 1992)), this Court held that:
The rule that questions not raised in the lower court will not be reviewed on appeal is particularly true where constitutional questions are involved.
¶ 5. A trial judge cannot be put in error on a matter not presented to him. See Bender. See also Mills v. Nichols, 467 So.2d 924, 931 (Miss.1985)
. This Court
has repeatedly held that issues not raised at trial cannot be raised on appeal. See Parker v. Mississippi Game and Fish Commission, 555 So.2d 725, 730 (Miss. 1989).
¶ 6. Southern further contends that the trial court erred in not allowing him "to proceed with its [his] claim for make-whole [r]elief against [e]vil." The only issue on appeal necessary for this Court's consideration is whether the trial court erred in dismissing Southern's complaint for failure to comply with the statute of limitation.
¶ 7. From Southern's complaint it is difficult to determine what relief exactly he sought from the trial court. However, it appears that Southern attempted to make a claim of medical malpractice, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, mental anguish, loss of business and loss of enjoyment of life resulting from the actions of the state hospital and Drs. Jackson and Murray in connection with his court ordered commitment to Whitfield. Southern sought a judgment for $9,000,000 from each doctor.
¶ 8. Southern was discharged from the Mississippi State Hospital on December 10, 1999, after being committed by the Chancery Court of Hinds County on April 28, 1999. Southern filed his complaint in the Circuit Court of Rankin County on June 19, 2002.
¶ 9. The trial court dismissed Southern's complaint citing various reasons for the dismissal. The trial court stated that Southern had "failed to file his claim within the one year statute of limitations under § 11-46-11 of Mississippi Code Annotated and therefore is barred from maintaining this lawsuit and all its claims against all [d]efendants." We agree.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Electronic Data Sys. Corp. v. MS DIV. OF MEDICAID
... 853 So.2d 1192 ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION ... MISSISSIPPI DIVISION OF MEDICAID, Rica Lewis-Payton, In Her Official Capacity as ... DOM is but one of many state administrative agencies required to procure personal and professional ... State Dep't of Health, 546 So.2d 972, 974 (Miss.1989) ; Grant Ctr. Hosp. v. Health Group of Jackson Miss., Inc., 528 So.2d 804, 808 (Miss.1988) ; ... ...
-
Pascagoula Sch. Dist. v. Tucker
...725 So.2d 241, 245 (Miss.1998).... A trial court cannot be placed in error on a matter not presented to it. Southern v. Mississippi State Hosp., 853 So.2d 1212, 1214 (Miss.2003).On September 24, 2010, the chancery court denied the plaintiffs' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. Following that d......
-
Breland v. Forrest Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't
...exclusive civil remedy against a governmental entity or its employee for acts or omissions which give rise to a suit." Southern v. Miss. State Hosp., 853 So. 2d 1212, 1215 (¶ 10) (Miss. 2003) (citations omitted). Under the MTCA, suits against governmental entities must "be commenced within ......
-
Pascagoula Sch. Dist. v. Tucker
...2d 241, 245 (Miss. 1998) . . . . A trial court cannot be placed in error on a matter not presented to it. Southern v. Mississippi State Hosp., 853 So. 2d 1212, 1214 (Miss. 2003).On September 24, 2010, the chancery court denied the plaintiffs' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. Following that d......
-
Related State Torts
...Years— Peterson v. Art Van Furniture , 2003 WL 1985262 (Mich. 2003). • Mississippi— One Year— Southern v. Mississippi State Hosp. , 853 So.2d 1212, (Miss. 2003). • New York —One Year— Kwarren v. American Airlines , 303 A.D.2d 722, 757 N.Y.S.2d 105, 106 (N.Y. 2003). • Tennessee —One Year— Le......