Southwest Dairy Products Co. v. De Frates, 2204-7251.
Decision Date | 22 February 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 2204-7251.,2204-7251. |
Citation | 125 S.W.2d 282 |
Parties | SOUTHWEST DAIRY PRODUCTS CO., Inc., v. DE FRATES et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action by L. C. De Frates and others against the Southwest Dairy Products Company, Incorporated, to recover for damages to a taxicab resulting from a collision with defendant's truck. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals. On certified question.
Question answered.
Eskridge & Groce and Russell Talbott, all of San Antonio, for appellant.
Moursund, Ball, Moursund & Bergstrom, of San Antonio, for appellees.
HICKMAN, Commissioner.
This case is before us on certificate from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District at Fort Worth. In the trial court judgment was rendered in favor of appellees against appellant for damages to a taxicab resulting from a collision between the taxicab and a truck owned by appellant and being driven at the time by one of its employees, Alonzo Henderson. The judgment was based upon findings by a jury that the collision with its resultant injury to the taxicab was proximately caused by the negligence of Henderson, who at the time was acting within the scope of his employment by the appellant. The certificate in part is as follows:
The question certified is as follows: "Should the assignment of error referred to above be sustained?"
The certificate is accompanied by a tentative opinion by Chief Justice Dunklin in which the view is expressed that the assignment should be sustained. In this view we concur. Cases involving facts more or less like the facts of this case are legion. We have considered a great many of them from this and other jurisdictions, but do not find it necessary or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Morris v. Jtm Materials, Inc.
...business and not whether he purposed to resume it." Robertson Tank Lines, 468 S.W.2d at 360 (quoting S.W. Dairy Prods. Co. v. De Frates, 132 Tex. 556, 125 S.W.2d 282, 283 (1939)); see also Gant, 935 S.W.2d at Thus, even considering Largent's affidavit, there is no evidence in record that he......
-
Bell v. Martin
... ... A.L.R. 854, 878 when the holding in Southwest Dairy ... Products Co. v. De Frates, 132 Tex. 556, 125 ... ...
-
Garcia v. US
...that a truck driver was not within the scope of employment in a similar situation. See id. (citing to Southwest Dairy Products Co. v. De Frates, 132 Tex. 556, 125 S.W.2d 282 (1939)). Returning to his route after having diverted from it to go home for supper, the truck driver in De Frates wa......
-
Arbelaez v. Just Brakes Corp.
...where the servant was carrying out, albeit negligently, the express directions of the master. See, e.g., Southwest Dairy Products Co. v. De Frates, 125 S.W.2d 282 (Tex.1939) (driver detoured from mission to obtain supper); International & G.N.R. Co. v. Anderson, 82 Tex. 516, 17 S.W. 1039 (1......