Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Artesia Alfalfa Growers' Ass'n
Citation | 353 P.2d 62,1960 NMSC 52,67 N.M. 108 |
Decision Date | 09 June 1960 |
Docket Number | No. 6631,6631 |
Parties | SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARTESIA ALFALFA GROWERS' ASSOCIATION, a cooperative association incorporated, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | Supreme Court of New Mexico |
Hervey, Dow & Hinkle, Roswell, for appellant.
W. M. Siegenthaler, Artesia, Brown & Brainerd, Roswell, for appellee.
Plaintiff-appellant, Southwestern Public Service Company, a corporation, filed suit to recover for services furnished defendant-appellee, Artesia Alfalfa Growers' Association, a cooperative association incorporated. Appellee filed its answer and a counterclaim alleging that three of its motors were damaged sometime between January 9, 1957, to June 1, 1957, through the negligence of appellant, and that appellant is indebted to appellee.
Appellant filed a motion for summary judgment on its original complaint and judgment was entered for appellant. Said judgment was paid and satisfied. Thereafter, the trial proceeded on appellee's counterclaim.
Appellant filed its answer to the counterclaim and the court, after hearing said cause, found the issues for appellee, made its findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment for appellee. From said judgment, appellant, the original plaintiff, appeals.
Appellee is an incorporated cooperative marketing association located at Artesia, New Mexico. Appellant is a public service corporation maintaining its principal place of business at Roswell, New Mexico, and is engaged in the business of generating and transmission of electrical energy to the general public in and near Artesia, New Mexico.
Appellee, in 1957, owned and operated a feed processing mill at or near Artesia, New Mexico, which was equipped with numerous electrical appliances including three separate 200 H.P. 60 cycle electric motors which were specified by the manufacturer to be operated by three phase electrical energy of 2,300 volts.
Appellee, in its counterclaim, alleges that appellant owed the appellee a duty to furnish electrical energy, evenly balanced, and uniformly supplied in proper voltages in safe and convenient form in order to operate its equipment and appliances without danger to human life or property.
Appellee further alleged that between January 9, 1957, and June 1, 1957, appellant negligently failed to discharge such duty to appellee, and in violation of such duty negligently permitted the electrical energy to enter the premises in excessive, high, irregular, fluctuating and unbalanced voltages, and that appellant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable discretion, should have known that the energy then being supplied to appellee was not being delivered in a safe and convenient form, evenly balanced, and in a proper condition to be used safely in the operation of appellee's equipment and appliances. Appellee further alleged that by the exercise of proper diligence, appellant could have prevented the loss and damage complained of by proper installation and maintenance of its transmission lines and incidental equipment, which it negligently failed to do.
Appellee further alleged that as a direct and proximate result of the negligent acts and omissions on the part of the appellant, that three separate electric motors at the premises then owned by appellee between January 9, 1957 and June 1, 1957, were burned, the motor windings were destroyed and the appellee damaged in the amount of $5,735.41.
Appellant filed its answer denying the allegations of the counterclaim and in its first affirmative defense alleged that there was in force and effect a written contract between appellant and appellee which saved the company harmless from injury and damage to person or property.
In its second affirmative defense, appellant alleged:
'2. That the laws of the State of New Mexico authorize the State of New Mexico Public Service Commission to prescribe reasonable and adequate service regulations and standards of service rendered or to be rendered by any utility.
'3. That the Public Service Commission of the State of New Mexico by a regularly adopted order (its General Order No. 2) has provided that utilities shall file rate schedules, and regulations setting forth among other things, the following:
Appellant's rules numbered 6 and 13 filed and approved by the Public Service Commission, provide:
* * *
At the conclusion of the taking of testimony, but before the court had made formal findings of fact and conclusions of law, and before the entry of judgment, appellee moved and the court permitted appellee to make a trial amendment, alleging as follows:
The pertinent provisions of the contract dated September 26, 1952, provide as follows:
The trial court made the following findings of fact:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cobos v. Dona Ana County Housing Authority
...a matter of policy, because it seeks to exculpate Defendants from their own negligence. See Southwestern Pub. Serv. Co. v. Artesia Alfalfa Growers' Ass'n, 67 N.M. 108, 118, 353 P.2d 62, 69 (1960). That may be public policy where one party to a contract tries to insulate itself from negligen......
-
Quintana v. Santa Fe Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
..."Where there is no duty, there can be no negligence." Sw. Pub. Serv. Co. v. Artesia Alfalfa Growers' Ass'n, 1960-NMSC-052, ¶ 21, 353 P.2d 62, 68 (1960). See Herrera v. Quality Pontiac, 2003-NMSC-018, ¶ 6, 73 P.3d 181, 185-86 ("Generally, a negligence claim requires the existence of a duty f......
-
Tanner v. McMurray
..."Where there is no duty, there can be no negligence." Sw. Pub.Page 66 Serv. Co. v. Artesia Alfalfa Growers' Ass'n, 1960-NMSC-052 ¶ 21, 353 P.2d 62, 68 (1960). See Herrera v. Quality Pontiac, 2003-NMSC-018 ¶ 6, 73 P.3d 181, 185-86 ("Generally, a negligence claim requires the existence of a d......
-
Stark-Romero v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Co.
...common law or by statute.”). “Where there is no duty, there can be no negligence.” Sw. Pub. Serv. Co. v. Artesia Alfalfa Growers' Ass'n, 67 N.M. 108, 117, 353 P.2d 62, 68 (1960) (citation omitted). See [805 F.Supp.2d 1168] Herrera v. Quality Pontiac, 134 N.M. 43, 47–48, 73 P.3d 181, 185–86 ......
-
CLIMATE RISK IN THE ELECTRICITY SECTOR: LEGAL OBLIGATIONS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE RESILIENCE PLANNING BY ELECTRIC UTILITIES.
...involve widespread acts" rather than "an isolated action or transaction."). (519) Sw. Pub. Serv. Co. v. Artesia Alfalfa Growers' Ass'n, 353 P.2d 62, 68-69 (N.M. 1960); accord OS Farms, Inc. v. N.M. Am. Water Co., 218 P.3d 1269, 1277 (N.M. Ct. App. 2009) ("[W]hen there is a clear demarcation......