Southwick v. Southwick

Decision Date17 February 1903
Citation99 Mo. App. 156,72 S.W. 477
PartiesSOUTHWICK v. SOUTHWICK.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from circuit court, Oregon county; William N. Evans, Judge.

Action between S. G. Southwick and Lizzie Southwick. From a judgment for the former, the latter appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Alf. Harris, for appellant. S. M. Meeks, for respondent.

BLAND, P. J.

Rule 15 of this court (67 S. W. ix) requires the appellant in a civil case to file with the clerk of the court, at least one day before the cause is called for trial, four copies of a brief containing: "First. A clear and concise statement of the pleadings and facts shown by the record. Second. An enumeration in numerical order of the points or legal propositions made or relied on, accompanied by the citation of authorities supporting each proposition," etc. Section 863, Rev. St. 1899, requires that on appeal or writ of error each party, on or before the day next preceding the day on which the cause is docketed for hearing, shall make out and furnish the court with a clear and concise statement of the case and the points intended to be insisted on in argument. Rule 15 is the court's interpretation of this statute. Appellant has substantially complied with the second requirement of the statute by stating the propositions relied on for a reversal of the judgment, but has utterly failed to comply with the first requirement of the rule. The only reference to the pleadings or the facts made in her brief is the following parenthetical sentence, to wit: "See petition and evidence in the case." The penalty for failure of appellant to comply with rule 15 is that the court shall dismiss the appeal or reset the case. See rule 19 (67 S. W. ix). We have not been asked to reset the case; therefore we dismiss the appeal.

REYBURN and GOODE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State ex rel. And To Use of Kansas City Light & Power Co. v. Trimble
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1922
    ... ... The rules prescribed dismissal as the penalty for such ... an omission. The same is true of Isaac v. Lumber ... Co., 47 Mo.App. 30. In Southwick v. Southwick, ... 99 Mo.App. 156, 72 S.W. 477, a rule was followed which ... prescribed a dismissal of the appeal as the penalty for ... failure ... ...
  • Longan v. Kansas City Railways Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1923
    ... ... Sec. 1511, R. S. 1919; ... Rule 15, par. 1; Snyder v. Free, 102 Mo. 325; ... Mills v. McDaniels, 59 Mo.App. 334; Southwick v ... Southwick, 99 Mo.App. 156; Wade v. Bankers Life ... Assn., 145 Mo.App. 172; Dodson v. Karshner Motor Car ... Co., 204 S.W. 590; Redmondowh ... ...
  • Logan v. Kansas City Rys. Co
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 11, 1923
    ...Casualty Co. (Mo. App.) 205 S. W. 874, 875; Wade v. Bankers' L. Ass'n et al., 145 Mo. App. 172, 173, 129 S. W. 1004; Southwick v. Southwick, 99 Mo. App. 156, 72 S. W. 477; Mills v. McDaniels, 59 Mo. App. loc. cit. 334. We have, however, carefully read the record and briefs of counsel, and i......
  • Wheeler v. Shull
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 1926
    ...18 of this court; State v. Parrish, 270 S. W. 688, 307 Mo. 455; Pfotenhauer v. Ridgway, 271 S. W. 50, 307 Mo. 529; Southwick v. Southwick, 72 S. W. 477, 99 Mo. App. 156; Mills v. McDaniels, 59 Mo. App. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT