Southworth v. Southworth
| Decision Date | 22 May 1897 |
| Citation | 47 N.E. 93,168 Mass. 511 |
| Parties | SOUTHWORTH v. SOUTHWORTH. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from superior court, Suffolk county.
Petition by Southworth against Southworth to alter a decree for alimony. From a decree for petitioner, respondent appeals. Affirmed.Robert H. Roy, for appellant.
W.S.B. Hopkins, F.B. Smith, and T.H. Gage, Jr., for appellee.
The court was right in declining to rule as requested by the respondent, and in the ruling given at the request of the petitioner. The stipulation for alimony to be decreed in the suit for divorce added nothing to the force of the decree, and did not affect the power of the court to change the rights of the parties by further orders or decrees respecting alimony. Pub.St. c. 146, § 39. Upon the petition the court had power to revise and modify the decree, as it deemed reasonable upon all the circumstances of the case. Graves v. Graves, 108 Mass. 314, 321;Foster v. Foster, 130 Mass. 189, 191. Whether the respondent's remarriage had in fact so changed her financial condition that she did not need the provision made for her by the original decree was a matter upon which either party could offer evidence. It was not alleged as a ground of the petition that her financial situation had been so changed, and the answer alleged that it was not materially different. The omission of the petitioner to introduce evidence to disprove an allegation made by the answer did not deprive him of the right to ask for a revision of the former decree upon such facts as appeared at the hearing. The remarriage was admitted, and, although the respondent and her husband were in court, she introduced no evidence. The remarriage was a material change in the circumstances of the respondent, giving her the right to be supported by another man. In the absence of proof that this right was not adequate to all her needs, the court might well deem it sufficient cause for revising the former decree, and for reducing the alimony to a nominal sum, and was right in ruling that prima facie it was such cause. Decree affirmed.
* State Report Title: Southworth v. Treadwell
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Keller v. O'Brien
...in circumstances allowing for the introduction of evidence relative to the need for continued support, citing Southworth v. Treadwell, 168 Mass. 511, 47 N.E. 93 (1897). She determined, however, that O'Brien was still in need of support, that Keller was still able to pay support, and that O'......
-
Keller v. O'Brien
...that remarriage is prima facie evidence of a material change of circumstance which would warrant termination. See Southworth v. Treadwell, 168 Mass. 511, 513, 47 N.E. 93 (1897) (absent proof that support by new spouse was not adequate to all wife's needs, court could reduce alimony to nomin......
-
Prime v. Prime
...to the force of the decree and does not affect the power of the court to enter further orders respecting alimony. Southworth v. Treadwell, 168 Mass. 511, 47 N.E. 93; Lally v. Lally, 152 Wisc. 56, 138 N.W. "In the instant case the agreements, which by the consent of the parties, and no doubt......
-
McHan v. McHan, 6491
... ... 879, 71 A. L ... R. 700; 19 C. J., pp. 271, 272; Phy v. Phy, 116 Ore ... 31, 236 P. 751, 240 P. 237, 42 A. L. R. 588; Southworth ... v. Treadwell, 168 Mass. 511, 47 N.E. 93; Dickey v ... Dickey, 154 Md. 675, 141 A. 387, 58 A. L. R. 634.) ... A. F ... James, for ... ...