Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of World v. Grandon

Decision Date19 February 1902
Docket Number10,864
Citation89 N.W. 448,64 Neb. 39
PartiesSOVEREIGN CAMP OF WOODMEN OF THE WORLD v. HONORA GRANDON
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

ERROR from the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before POWELL, J. Reversed.

REVERSED.

Brome & Burnett, for plaintiff in error.

Timothy J. Mahoney and J. A. C. Kennedy, contra.

DUFFIE C. AMES and ALBERT, CC. concur.

OPINION

DUFFIE, C.

The plaintiff in error is a mutual benefit association doing a life insurance business in Douglas county, Nebraska, and elsewhere throughout the United States. On June 18, 1894 Thomas Grandon, the husband of the defendant in error, became a member of Alpha Camp, No. 1; and the plaintiff in error issued to said Thomas Grandon its beneficiary certificate, by the terms of which it agreed, in consideration of certain payments made and to be made, to pay the defendant in error the sum of $ 2,000 at the death of said Thomas Grandon. Grandon died May 6, 1897, and it is alleged in the petition filed in the district court that at the date of his death he was still a member of said fraternity, in good standing, and the holder of said beneficiary certificate, and died without having in anywise changed the appointee therein. It is further alleged that due notice and proof of the death of said Grandon was furnished to the defendant, but that defendant has wholly failed, refused and neglected to pay the plaintiff the amount due her under said certificate. The answer of the defendant admits that it is a mutual benefit association, and that Grandon became a member of said association in June, 1894, being a member of Alpha Camp, No 1, located at Omaha, Nebraska; admits that it issued to Thomas Grandon its beneficiary certificate, and alleges that it was provided by the terms of said certificate that if Grandon, at the time of his death, should be in good standing as a member of this fraternity, then and in that event it would pay the plaintiff below the sum of $ 2,000 at the death of said Grandon. The answer admits the death of Grandon and proof of such death. As a defense to the action, it is alleged that Grandon had failed to comply with the constitution and laws adopted by defendant governing said order and its members; that section 108 of the constitution of the order provided as follows: "On or about the 20th day of each month, the sovereign commander and chairman of the sovereign finance committee shall determine the number of assessments, if any, necessary to provide for the payment of deaths which may be registered for payment and shall so notify the sovereign clerk. In beneficiary head camp jurisdictions, this shall be determined in such manner as its laws may provide"; that section 109 of the constitution is as follows: "Every member of this order, unless otherwise notified by the clerk of his camp, in the manner herein provided, shall pay to the said clerk every month, one assessment in the beneficiary fund, together with one monthly payment of the sovereign camp or beneficiary head camp general fund dues and camp dues, as levied, also any additional assessments for beneficiary fund or special general fund dues, which may have been ordered by the sovereign camp or beneficiary head camp, as the case may be; and if he fails to pay either on or before the first day of the month following, he shall stand suspended, and during such suspension his beneficiary certificate shall be void." The answer further alleges that at the time Grandon became a member, and at all times since, the constitution and laws of the defendant contained the following provision: "Should a suspended member personally appear and apply for reinstatement within three months from the date of his suspension and pay all arrearages, if in good health, he shall be restored to membership and his beneficiary certificate again become valid as soon as said payment shall have been received and recorded by the clerk of his camp. If a delinquent member does not appear in person to pay his arrearages, he shall send to the clerk a written statement on the official form, furnished by the sovereign camp or beneficiary head camp, to the effect that he is in good health as a condition precedent to reinstatement and waiving all rights thereto if his said written statement shall be found untrue. If the representations and statements made in said written statement be untrue, then said payments shall not cause his reinstatement." It is further alleged that Thomas Grandon was not, at the time of his death, a member of said fraternity in good standing, for the following reasons: That the amount of each assessment to be paid by said Grandon was the sum of $ 1.45; that the amount of camp dues to be paid by him was 30 cents monthly. It is alleged that he failed to pay assessment No. 70 for $ 1.45, as well, also, as camp dues for the month of February, 1897, and that by reason of said default and non-payment, his beneficiary certificate became wholly null and void. It is further alleged that assessment No. 71 was duly made by the sovereign commander and chairman of the finance committee on March 20, 1897, for the payment of deaths registered, and April 20, 1897, assessments Nos. 72 and 73 were duly made; that up to May 5, 1897, Grandon had failed to pay assessments 70, 71, 72 and 73, which amount, in the aggregate, to the sum of $ 5.80; that he also had failed to pay his camp dues up to May 1, 1897, which amount, in the aggregate, to the sum of $ 1.20, and that he had been suspended for such non-payment from and after March 1, 1897. It is further alleged in the answer that on May 5, 1897, the daughter of Thomas Grandon called at the office of the clerk of Alpha Camp, and ascertained the amount necessary to reinstate him, and paid the amount; that the clerk informed her at the time that, Grandon not having called in person and paid the amount, it was necessary for him to send a certificate, as provided by the constitution and laws of the order; that he gave her a blank certificate in the official form furnished by the sovereign camp, which was to be filled out and signed by said Grandon, and which certificate contained a statement that said Grandon was in good health, as a condition precedent to reinstatement, and waiving all rights thereto if his said written statement shall be found untrue; that on the next day, to wit, May 6, 1897, said certificate, signed by said Thomas Grandon by the making of his mark thereon, was received by the clerk through the United States mail, but that Grandon had died on said day, previous to the receipt of said certificate by the clerk. It is further alleged that Thomas Grandon was not in good health at the time of signing said certificate, and that by reason of the foregoing facts he had never been reinstated in the order, and that the defendant was not liable for the amount of his certificate. A trial of the case resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff below, on which judgment was entered, and the record is brought to this court for review.

One of the controversies between the parties is the meaning of the word "send" found in the following clause of the constitution of the order: "If a delinquent member does not appear in person to pay his arrearages, he shall send to the clerk a written statement on the official form, furnished by the sovereign camp or beneficiary head camp, to the effect that he is in good health as a condition precedent to reinstatement, and waiving all rights thereto if his said written statement shall be found to be untrue. If the representations and statements made in said written statement be untrue, then said payments shall not cause his reinstatement." It will be borne in mind that Grandon was delinquent...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Chatfield v. Iowa & Arkansas Land Company
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • November 16, 1908
    ...not required by law but kept for convenience are not competent as public records. 135 U.S. 109; 131 Ala. 286; 143 Mass. 77; 90 Minn. 239; 64 Neb. 39; 173 N.Y. 374; 57 794; 10 Enc. Ev. 722. All presumptions are in favor of the acts of a public officer on collateral attack. 22 Ark. 556; 43 Id......
  • Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. Grandon
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • February 19, 1902

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT