Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Const., Inc., 95-0198
| Decision Date | 07 June 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-0198,95-0198 |
| Citation | 657 So.2d 24 |
| Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D1341 SPACE DEVELOPMENT, INC., Individually and as general partner of Space Development, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA ONE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Arthur J. England, Jr., and Charles M. Auslander of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.
Robert Paul Keeley and William S. Spencer of Ellis, Spencer & Butler, Hollywood, for respondent.
We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and remand with instructions to require plaintiff to post a good and sufficient bond or grant defendant's motion to dissolve lis pendens. We conclude that, even viewing the evidence most favorably to respondent, there is no evidence or showing of any intention that respondent would acquire title to any of the subject real property; and consequently there was no showing of any nexus between the legal or equitable title to the property and respondent's claims below. See Chiusolo v. Kennedy, 614 So.2d 491 (Fla.1993); Acapulco Construction, Inc. v. Redavo Estates, Inc., 645 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Moreover, the failure to require a bond was a departure from the essential requirements of law for which there is no adequate remedy by final appeal. See, e.g., Feinstein v. Dolene, Inc., 455 So.2d 1126, 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
CERTIORARI GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Katz Deli of Aventura, Inc. v. Waterways Plaza, LLC
...be a "nexus between the legal or equitable title to the property and [the plaintiff's] claims below." Space Dev., Inc. v. Fla. One Constr., Inc., 657 So.2d 24, 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). This nexus requires that the plaintiff's claim could potentially grant some interest in the realty itself b......
-
Deguzman v. Balsini, 5D06-393.
...law. See Medical Facilities Dev., Inc. v. Little Arch Creek Properties; 675 So.2d 915 (Fla.1996); Space Development, Inc. v. Florida One Construction, Inc., 657 So.2d 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). However, a lis pendens in this case should not have been filed because there is no connection betwee......
-
Sailfish Point, Inc. v. Sailfish Point Owners Representatives by Jaffe, s. 96-0523
...an order denying in part its motion to dissolve a lis pendens. This court has certiorari jurisdiction. Space Dev., Inc. v. Florida One Constr., Inc., 657 So.2d 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Finkelstein v. Finkelstein, 603 So.2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We grant the petition for certiorari and qua......
-
Eurohome Di Soleil, LLC v. Oaks Group, Inc., 4D05-2681.
...of it is conditioned on the posting of a bond to protect the seller from any resulting losses. Space Dev., Inc. v. Fla. One Constr., Inc., 657 So.2d 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). STEVENSON, C.J. and WARNER, J., ...