Spann v. City of N.Y.
| Decision Date | 21 December 2016 |
| Citation | 43 N.Y.S.3d 143,2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 08558,145 A.D.3d 932 |
| Parties | Carolyn SPANN, appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., respondents (and another title). |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
145 A.D.3d 932
43 N.Y.S.3d 143
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 08558
Carolyn SPANN, appellant,
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., respondents (and another title).
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec. 21, 2016.
Chelli & Bush, Staten Island, N.Y. (Laurel A. Wedinger of counsel), for appellant.
Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford P.C., New York, N.Y. (Andrew P. Keaveney and Jonathan Adler of counsel), for respondents City of New York, MV Transportation, Inc., New York City Transit Authority, and Jose Casanova.
Martyn, Toher, Martyn & Rossi (Harris, King, Fodera & Correia, New York, N.Y. [Chikodi E. Emerenini], of counsel), for respondent Farrah Ficco.
L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, and COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the
plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Aliotta, J.), dated July 17, 2014, which denied her motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident, and granted the cross motion of the defendants City of New York, MV Transportation, Inc., New York City Transit Authority, and Jose Casanova, and the separate cross motion of the defendant Farrah Ficco, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof granting the cross motion of the defendants City of New York, MV Transportation, Inc., New York City Transit Authority, and Jose Casanova, and the separate cross motion of the defendant Farrah Ficco, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Testa v. Lorefice
...2019 NY Slip Op 34569(U) Joseph Testa and Julie Testa, Plaintiff, v. Elaina M. Lorefice, Erik A. Karlund, ... (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., supra; Boone v ... New York City Tr. Auth., 263 A.D.2d 463, 692 N.Y.S.2d ... 731 [2d Dept 1999]) ... Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345, 746 ... N.Y.S.2d 865 [2002], Spann v City of New York, 145 ... A.D.3d 932, 43 N.Y.S.3d 143 [2d Dept 2016]). In his bill of ... ...
-
Rush v. Save My Home Corp.
... ... 21, 2016.45 N.Y.S.3d 114Anthony C. Giordano, Garden City, NY, for appellant.Davis Polk & Wardwell, LLP, New York, NY (Daniel F. Kolb, Nancy B. Ludmerer, and ... ...
-
Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Medley
...properly before this Court, as they involve matters that were not the subject of the order appealed from (see Spann v. City of New York , 145 A.D.3d 932, 934, 43 N.Y.S.3d 143 ). AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., ...
-
Spann v. City of N.Y.
...in the order dated July 17, 2014, must be dismissed as academic in light of our determination in Spann v. City of New York, ––– A.D.3d ––––, 43 N.Y.S.3d 143, 2016 WL 7380636 (Appellate Division Docket No. 2014–09980; decided herewith).HALL, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., ...