Sparks v. Sparks
| Decision Date | 11 October 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 237,237 |
| Citation | 61 S.E.2d 356,232 N.C. 492 |
| Parties | SPARKS, v. SPARKS et al. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Hall & Zachary, Yadkinville, for plaintiff, appellee.
Fouts & Watson, Burnsville and Spruce Pine, for defendants, appellants.
The Constitution of North Carolina guarantees to every litigant the 'sacred and inviolable' right to demand a trial by jury of the issues of fact arising 'in all controversies at law respecting property', and he cannot be deprived of this right except by his own consent. N.C.Const. Art. I, Sec. 19. The Code of Civil Procedure provides that issues of fact must be tried by a jury, unless a trial by jury is waived or a reference ordered. G.S. § 1-172.
The defendants did not waive their constitutional and statutory right to have the issues of fact joined on the pleadings in this case tried by a jury. N.C.Const. Art. IV, Sec. 13; G.S. § 1-184. This being true, the presiding judge had no authority to answer the issues, and to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff upon his answers to the issues. In consequence, the judgment is set aside, and the cause is remanded for a new trial to the end that the determinative issues of fact raised by the pleadings may be submitted to a jury for decision. Crews v. Crews, 175 N.C. 168, 95 S.E. 149; Cozad v. Johnson, 171 N.C. 637, 89 S.E. 37; Hockaday v. Lawrence, 156 N.C. 319, 72 S.E. 387; Hahn v. Brinson, 133 N.C. 7, 45 S.E. 359; Wilson v. Bynum, 92 N.C. 717, 718; Chasteen v. Martin, 81 N.C. 51; Hyatt v. Myers, 73 N.C. 232; Andrews v. Pritchett, 66 N.C. 387.
Error.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Erickson v. Starling
...law must be tried by the judge; but issues of fact must be tried by a jury, unless trial by jury is waived. G.S. § 1-172; Sparks v. Sparks, 232 N.C. 492, 61 S.E.2d 356. This is true even though the issues of fact are raised by pleadings in actions for the enforcement of equitable rights. Bo......
-
Cutts v. Casey
...272 N.C. 16, 157 S.E.2d 693; Mangum v. Yow, 263 N.C. 525, 139 S.E.2d 537; Ingle v. McCurry, 243 N.C. 65, 89 S.E.2d 745; Sparks v. Sparks, 232 N.C. 492, 61 S.E.2d 356; Fox v. Army Store, 215 N.C. 187, 1 S.E.2d 550. North Carolina General Statutes § 1A--1, Rule 38, specifically refers to this......
-
State ex rel. Freeman v. Ponder, 105
...on the pleadings tried by the jury. G.S. § 1-172. The motion called on the judge to usurp the function of that body. Sparks v. Sparks, 232 N.C. 492, 61 S.E.2d 356. Besides, all the evidence before the Court at the time the motion was made tended to establish the election of Davis reserved e......
-
Wescott v. State Highway Commission, 22
...proceeding into an action in ejectment or trespass to try title. On that issue petitioner was entitled to a jury trial. Sparks v. Sparks, 232 N.C. 492, 61 S.E.2d 356; Grantham v. Nunn, 188 N.C. 239, 124 S.E. 309; Board of Comrs. of Stokes County v. George, 182 N.C. 414, 109 S.E. 77; Crews v......