Spears v. State, 74--70
| Decision Date | 08 November 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 74--70,74--70 |
| Citation | 302 So.2d 805 |
| Parties | Michael C. SPEARS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James A. Gardner, Public Defender and Robert B. Persons, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Spears appeals an order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing him on probation for a period of two years for possession of marijuana, after pleading nolo contendere and specifically reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence.
After Spears had been charged with possession of marijuana, he filed a motion to suppress the evidence. At the hearing on his motion, Paul Westfall testified that around 3:30 in the morning he saw a man standing under the window of his next-door neighbor, Pam Sweeney. Westfall got a gun, asked his wife to call the police, and told the man to step out in the light. When he stepped out under the street light Westfall and his wife recognized him as being Mike Spears, a boy who lived two houses from them and worked at a Little General store down the street. Westfall instructed Spears to go on home or he would call the police, and Spears told him to call the police. Spears said that his reason for being there was that Pam had left a message for him to come by and wake her up when he got home. Westfall went back in the house and Spears waited outside about fifteen minutes for the police. When the police arrived Westfall told them that he knew Spears. He testified he heard one of the police officers say he knew Spears' father.
Police Officer Keith testified that when he arrived he asked Spears for identification and Spears produced his I.D. card. Spears told Keith that he lived in the area and worked for the Little General store. When the officer asked Spears his reason for being in the neighborhood, he replied that he had been to his girlfriend's house next door. The officer said he did not believe Spears' story about the girl friend and thought it was suspicious at that time in the morning, so he placed Spears under arrest for night prowling. At this point, the officer advised Spears of his rights, placed handcuffs on him and searched him for possible weapons. He found a bag of marijuana in Spears' left boot. The officer did not talk with Pam Sweeney until After he had placed Spears...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Wynn
...him, the confession and the officer's testimony on what he saw or heard during the arrest procedure." Id. at 502. See Spears v. State, D.C.A.Fla. 2, 1974, 302 So.2d 805; Betancourt v. State, supra, Spataro v. State, supra, 179 So.2d at We are satisfied that the present case is governed by t......
-
Boal v. State, 78-1721
...v. Ecker, 311 So.2d 104 (Fla.1975), Cert. den.; Bell v. Florida, 423 U.S. 1019, 96 S.Ct. 455, 46 L.Ed.2d 391 (1975); Spears v. State, 302 So.2d 805 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence for carrying a concealed firearm are affirmed, but the judgment and sentence for loi......
-
A loitering and prowling primer.
...may not rely on a statement given to another civilian individual on the scene. [25] D.L.B., 685 So. 2d at 1340. [26] Spears v. State, 302 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. [27] Robinson v. State, 550 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1989). [28] Ecker, 311 So. 2d at 110. [29] D.A., 471 So. 2d at 154. S......