Speer v. Southwest Missouri Railroad Company
Decision Date | 02 March 1915 |
Parties | JOHN H. SPEER v. SOUTHWEST MISSOURI RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. -- Hon. D. E. Blair, Judge.
Transferred to Springfield Court of Appeals.
McReynolds & Halliburton for appellant.
A. C Young for respondent; Thomas & Hackney of counsel.
This is a suit for personal injuries. The plaintiff, in company with the owner of an automobile, was injured by reason of a collision between the automobile and one of defendant's electric street-railway cars. The plaintiff charged in his petition that the electric street-railway car was being run in excess of six miles an hour, in violation of a city ordinance of Webb City, Missouri, and that the defendant negligently failed to give any warning of the approach of said car as said car was approaching a public street crossing. The answer was (1) a general denial, and (2) contributory negligence pleaded in minute detail. Reply a general denial. Plaintiff had judgment for $ 1000 and defendant has appealed. The cause was evidently brought here on the theory that there was a constitutional question involved. We are of the opinion that there is no such question properly raised or involved in this record, and for that reason, this cause should be transferred to the Springfield Court of Appeals. The constitutional questions are thus stated in the motion for new trial:
The instruction "J" referred to reads:
"The court instructs the jury that the ordinance of Webb City limiting speed of cars on and across the streets does not apply to defendant, being in violation of its franchise from city of Webb City."
Section 12 of Ordinance No. 137, being the franchise ordinance, referred to, and offered in evidence, but not admitted, reads:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Liebing v. Mutual Life Ins. Company
... ... MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant Supreme Court of Missouri December 12, 1918 ... Appeal ... from St. Louis City ... Liverpool Co. v. Phenix, 129 U.S. 397, 447; ... Coghlan v. Railroad, 142 U.S. 101, 109; London ... Assur. v. Companhia, 167 U.S. 149, 160; ... 163; Deiner v ... Sutermeister, 266 Mo. 514; Speer v. Railroad, ... 264 Mo. 265; Miller v. Connor, 250 Mo. 677; ... ...
-
Oakley v. Richards
... ... RICHARDS et al., Appellants Supreme Court of Missouri, First Division July 5, 1918 ... ... Railway, 106 Mo. 434; Smith ... v. Railroad, 69 Mo. 40; Dunning v. Jacobs, 36 ... N.Y.S. 453. (c) ... 674; Lohmeyer v. Cordage ... Co., 214 Mo. 689; Speer v. Railroad, 174 S.W ... 381. (4) The Picture Show ... ...
-
McGrath v. Meyers
...194; State v. Tunnell, 302 Mo. 433; Magill v. Boatmen's Bank, 250 S.W. 41; Burns v. Prudential Ins. Co., 247 S.W. 159; Spear v. Southwest Mo. Railroad Co., 174 S.W. 381; Roper v. Greenspon, 192 S.W. 149; Roper Greenspon, 198 S.W. 1107. (2) The court committed reversible error by giving defe......
-
State ex rel. And To Use of Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
... ... is an appeal by the relator, the Missouri Pacific Railroad ... Company, from a judgment of the circuit court of Cole county, ... they will be regarded as waived. Speer v. Railroad, 264 Mo ... loc. cit. 267, 174 S.W. 381; State v. Gamma, 215 ... ...