Spencer v. Gabriel
| Decision Date | 31 October 1951 |
| Citation | 101 N.E.2d 369,328 Mass. 1 |
| Parties | SPENCER et al. v. GABRIEL. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
R. A. Lewis, Pittsfield, for plaintiff.
E. E. Reder, Pittsfield, for defendant.
Before QUA, C. J., and WILKINS, SPALDING, WILLIAMS and COUNIHAN, JJ.
The declaration alleges that the defendant sold and conveyed to the plaintiffs a certain dwelling house which he had built so negligently that in cold weather there was 'a substantial and unreasonable risk' that the hot water heating pipes would freeze and burst; that the defendant, as vendor, 'knowing of the condition and the risk involved and having reason to believe that the plaintiffs, being unskilled in such matters, would not realize the risk, concealed or failed to disclose the risk in negligent disregard of the rights of the plaintiffs as vendees'; and that in consequence a section of the heating pipes froze and burst 'exactly as had been risked,' causing substantial damage to their real and personal property. The plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Appellate Division sustaining the defendant's demurrer and reversing a contrary ruling by the District Court judge.
There is no allegation of fraud or misrepresentation. The kernel of the action is negligent concealment or failure on the part of a vendor of real estate to disclose defects known to him which he had reason to believe would not become known to the buyers. There was a simple failure to reveal where there was no duty to speak. This is a case of bare nondisclosure, and is governed in every essential particular by our recent decision in Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank, 311 Mass. 677, 42 N.E.2d 808, 141 A.L.R. 965, with full citation of authorities.
Order sustaining demurrer affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McDonough v. Whalen
...work, if negligently done, may cause damage to the property or injury to persons living on or using the premises. 8 Spencer v. Gabriel, 328 Mass. 1, 101 N.E.2d 369 (1951), and Donahue v. Stephens, 342 Mass. 89, 172 N.E.2d 101 (1961), cited by the Appeals Court, 9 as raising doubts about the......
-
McMahon v. M & D Builders, Inc.
...of such warranties. To the extent that we have considered this question, we have not committed ourselves to that trend. Spencer v. Gabriel, 328 Mass. 1, 101 N.E.2d 369. Donahue v. Stephens, 342 Mass. 89, 92, 172 N.E.2d 101. Albano v. Western Constr. Corp., 357 Mass. ---, 260 N.E.2d 212. Whi......
-
Kannavos v. Annino
...(2d ed.) §§ 1497--1500. There was, in our opinion, much more than 'bare nondisclosure' as in the Swinton case. Cf. Spencer v. Gabriel, 328 Mass. 1, 2, 101 N.E.2d 369; Donahue v. Stephens, 342 Mass. 89, 92, 172 N.E.2d 2. There is no occasion to consider the arguments of the vendors concernin......
-
McDonough v. Whalen
...from the general principles of Carter v. Yardley & Co. Ltd. and Brown v. Bigelow, both supra. Two later cases, Spencer v. Gabriel, 328 Mass. 1, 101 N.E.2d 369 (1951), and Donahue v. Stephens, 342 Mass. 89, 172 N.E.2d 101 (1961), hold that a seller of a house is not liable in tort to the pur......