Spencer v. Southland Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 04 November 1960 |
Docket Number | No. 16142,16142 |
Citation | 340 S.W.2d 335 |
Parties | Florence M. SPENCER, Appellant, v. SOUTHLAND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Fender, Sayers & Anderson, and John M. Anderson, Fort Worth, for appellant.
R. L. Dillard, Jr., Curtis White, and D. D. Crawford, Dallas, for appellee.
Suit was brought by Florence M. Spencer, widow and beneficiary of Luther George Spencer, against Southland Life Insurance Company to recover the proceeds of an accident insurance policy. The trial court, holding that the death of Spencer, the insured, was not the result of accidental bodily injuries, rendered summary judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff contends a fact issue was presented as to whether or not Spencer's death was accidental.
The policy in question provided that the defendant 'Hereby insures Luther George Spencer (hereinafter called 'Insured') under classification D* by occupation a Proprietor-Superintendent Dairy subject to all the provisions, exclusions, and conditions of this policy, against loss, to the extent hereinafter provided, resulting from accidental bodily injuries which are the direct and independent cause of the loss and are sustained by the insured during the term of this policy * * *.'
The circumstances of the death of Spencer are shown by two affidavits submitted with proof of loss by plaintiff to defendant. Wayne Horton, age 15, nephew of insured, swore he was with his uncle in a pickup truck on August 8, 1959. As they drove through Euless they saw a policeman at the side of the street. The officer waved and insured waved back. They kept going. After proceeding 3/4 mile affiant saw the officer following them and so informed insured. Insured said, 'It looks like they've got us * * * It might as well be a good one.' Insured then cut off the highway onto a gravel road that makes a loop and comes back to the highway about a mile further on. They made the loop 'going pretty fast'. The police car was following all the time. They returned to the highway and on to the dairy barn which was their original destination. Affiant did not remember hearing the officer say anything after he told them to get in the car. After the shooting he heard insured say, "You shouldn't have done that." Affiant 'knew the gun had no shells in it as Spencer never carried a loaded gun.' During all this time the officer 'didn't offer to give us a ticket.'
Officer Kidwell swore that he clocked insured at a speed of 50 miles per hour on the main street in Euless. He turned on his red light, blew his horn and waved for insured to stop, insured made a waving motion with his hand but did not stop. In following insured he attained speeds up to 120 miles per hour. Upon reaching the dairy barn Affiant intended to shoot the gun out of insured's hand, instead, insured was mortally wounded. Kidwell had never seen insured before and did not learn his name until after the shooting. He did not offer to give insured a ticket while they were in the yard.
Although the affidavits were obtained and submitted by plaintiff, we must, since summary judgment was rendered for defendant, give plaintiff the benefit of every intendment reasonably deducible in her favor and accept the statements therein as true. Gulbenkian v. Penn, 151 Tex. 412, 252 S.W.2d 929. Plaintiff does not contend other evidence could be procured and does not contend the affidavits are inaccurate or that they contain anything other than the facts leading up to and culminating in the unfortunate occurrence.
Plaintiff argues that the effect of officer Kidwell's action was an attempt to falsely imprison insured and that insured had a right to use reasonable force to repel such imprisonment, that insured used reasonable force since he used an unloaded shotgun in attempting to protect himself, that Kidwell was the aggressor and committed an unprovoked attack upon insured.
Death is produced by, or as the result of, accidental means when it is not the natural and probable consequence of the means which produced it, or, stated differently, when death does not ordinarily follow and therefore cannot be reasonably anticipated as the result of the use of such means. Seaboard Life Ins. Co. v. Murphy, 134 Tex. 165, 132 S.W.2d 393.
The test of whether the killing is accidental within the terms of an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mendoza v. United States
...court of competent jurisdiction. Tex.Civ.Stat. Art. 6701d, § 148(a) (1960); Tex.Pen.Code Art. 792 (1961); Spencer v. Southland Life Ins. Co., Tex. Civ.App.1961, 340 S.W.2d 335. But see Tex.Civ.Stat. Art. 6701d, § 150 (1960): "The procedure described herein shall not otherwise be exclusive o......
-
Republic Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Heyward
...insurance policy. Seaboard Life Insurance Co. v. Murphy, 134 Tex. 165, 132 S.W.2d 393 (1939); Spencer v. Southland Life Insurance Co., 340 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1960, writ ref'd); National Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Hodge, 244 S.W. 863 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1922, no ......
-
Christian v. State
...(Douglas, J., dissenting); Montgomery v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 606, 170 S.W.2d 750, 752 (1943); Spencer v. Southland Life Ins. Co., 340 S.W.2d 335, 337 (Tex.Civ.App. Ft. Worth 1960) error refused; see also Ciulla v. State, 434 S.W.2d 948, 950-951 11 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (1st) 1968) no writ ......
-
Freeman v. Crown Life Ins. Co.
...v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 521 S.W.2d 367 (Tex.Civ.App.Waco 1975, no writ); Spencer v. Southland Life Insurance Company, 340 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ.App.Fort Worth 1960, writ ref'd); Wright v. Western and Southern Life Insurance Co., 443 S.W.2d 790 (Tex.Civ.App.Eastland 1969, no......