Spencer v. State, 1 Div. 304
Decision Date | 12 September 1972 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 304 |
Citation | 266 So.2d 902,48 Ala.App. 646 |
Parties | Calvin SPENCER v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
David L. Barnett, Mobile, for appellant.
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Richard F. Calhoun, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
A Mobile County Grand Jury indicted Calvin Spencer on February 12, 1971, for robbery. On June 2, 1971, he pled guilty to the indictment and was adjudged guilty by the court. This court on January 26, 1972, reversed that judgment of conviction for non-compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274.
Following this reversal, appellant's trial was reset for February 29, 1972. On that date a jury was qualified, impaneled, and sworn to hear the case. At that point, before any matter was addressed to the jury, the appellant through his attorney made known to the court that he would like to withdraw his plea of not guilty and enter one of guilty. As to exactly what transpired, the record shows the following:
'(Whereupon, a jury panel was brought in, having been previously qualified and struck by the Honorable William D. Bolling in another courtroom.)
The trial judge then proceeded to determine whether the plea of guilty was voluntarily and understandingly entered. After this occurred appellant was adjudged guilty by the court and later sentenced to serve seventeen years and nine months in the penitentiary. The jury took no part in determining the sentence.
Appellant contends that the trial judge did not have authority to fix the punishment. He reasons that the trial of the case had begun which rendered Tit. 15, § 277, Code of Alabama, as amended 1958, inoperative and that Tit. 14, § 415, and Tit. 30, § 70, Code of Alabama, 1940, make it mandatory that the jury fix the punishment. The statutes referred to are as follows:
Tit. 14, § 415--'Any person who is convicted of robbery shall be punished, At the discretion of the jury, by death, or by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than ten years. (Emphasis ours.)
Tit. 30, § 70--'At any time before a special venire has been drawn for the trial of any capital case, if the defendant enters a plea of guilty or in writing waives the right of a special venire, such plea of guilty or such waiver of special venire shall be entered of record, and, in either event, no special jury or venire shall be necessary for the trial of such cause; But the trial of the cause shall be had and the question of the degree of guilt must be ascertained and the punishment fixed by a jury to be selected from the panel of regular petit jurors organized by the court during the week such case is set for trial, in the same matter as juries are organized for the trial of felonies not capital; and the state and the defendant shall be allowed the same number of peremptory challenges as they are respectively allowed in the trial of felonies not capital.' (Emphasis ours.)
Tit. 15, § 277-- (Emphasis ours.)
We agree with his reasoning if trial had actually begun. See Headrick v. State, 46 Ala.App. 202, 239 So.2d 572, and cases cited therein.
The resolution of this issue requires the court to determine when trial began for ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Simpson v. State
...v. State, 290 Ala. 349, 276 So.2d 592 (1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 1118, 94 S.Ct. 855, 38 L.Ed.2d 747 (1974); Spencer v. State, 48 Ala.App. 646, 266 So.2d 902 (1972); Garsed v. State, supra. The nolle prosequi of an indictment is not exempt from this general rule. In Whitaker v. State, 21 ......
-
Albright v. State
...in the penitentiary for life. Under Headrick v. State, 46 Ala.App. 202, 239 So.2d 572, we are compelled to reverse. Cf. Spencer v. State, 48 Ala.App. 646, 266 So.2d 902. After jeopardy attaches and a criminal trial is underway, there is no longer a field of operation for Title 15, Section 2......
-
Andrews v. State
...to the jury and the defendant has pleaded to the indictment. Murray v. State, 210 Ala. 603, 98 So. 871 (1924); Spencer v. State, 48 Ala.App. 646, 266 So.2d 902 (1972); Garsed v. State, 50 Ala.App. 312, 278 So.2d 761 (1973); Simpson v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 354 So.2d 317, cert. denied, Ex part......
-
Port City Const. Co., Inc. v. Henderson
... ... 3 Div. 48 ... Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama ... Sept. 20, ... This writing was as follows: ... 'PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 1 ... Phone Cypress 6--3452 or Cypress 6--2515 ... P.O. Box ... Commercial Code as adopted by the legislature of this State. The portion of Section 2--202 quoted by appellant in the ... ...