Spiegel v. H. Allen Holmes, Inc.
Citation | 834 So.2d 295 |
Decision Date | 26 December 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 4D02-152, No. 4D02-467. |
Parties | Robert SPIEGEL, Appellant, v. H. ALLEN HOLMES, INC., a Florida Corporation and H. Allen Holmes, individually, Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Steven M. Selz of Law Offices of Selz & Muvdi Selz, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellant.
John L. Avery, Jr. of Law Offices of John L. Avery, Jr., Jupiter, for appellee.
A trial court's ability to enforce a settlement is questioned as the plaintiff appeals an order that enforced a settlement agreement against him. The plaintiff has raised four issues and the defendant/counter-claimant has cross-appealed. We affirm on all issues but one in the direct appeal, and reverse on the attorney's fees issue raised in the cross-appeal.
The plaintiff, a homeowner, filed suit against the defendant, alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and fraud in the inducement concerning an agreement for the provision of decorating services. The defendant counter-claimed for breach of contract, account stated, and foreclosure of a mechanic's lien.
The case proceeded to a non-jury trial. At the close of the first day of testimony, the parties met in an attempt to resolve their dispute. After negotiating a deal, the parties' attorneys left to prepare the written settlement agreement.
The next day, both lawyers advised the court's judicial assistant that a settlement had been reached and that a written settlement agreement was being prepared and would be filed. On the same day, the plaintiff's lawyer drafted two documents, a stipulation for settlement and a confidential settlement agreement. He forwarded them to the defendant's attorney.
The confidential settlement agreement was signed by the plaintiff's counsel, the defendant, and his attorney. Although the plaintiff did not sign the confidential settlement agreement, on the same date he prepared and signed a check made payable to the trust account of John L. Avery, Jr. P.A. (defendant's counsel) in the amount of $13,250.00, the amount agreed to in settlement of the dispute. Plaintiff's counsel retained the original check, but delivered a copy to the defendant's counsel. When the defendant's counsel called about the original check, plaintiff's counsel advised him that the plaintiff wanted certain window screens, which he was paying for in the settlement, but had not received.
When the check did not arrive, the defendant moved to compel enforcement of the settlement agreement. As no written settlement agreement had been filed with the court, the trial judge sent the parties to mediation. It was unsuccessful. The trial court then held a hearing on the defendant's motion to compel settlement, at which only the attorneys testified.
The court granted the defendant's motion, and ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant $13,250.00 within five (5) days. It further directed the parties to file dismissals of their respective claims with prejudice. The order did not retain jurisdiction for enforcement of the terms of the confidential settlement agreement and did not include all of its terms. The court denied the defendant's request for attorney's fees.
rev. denied, 542 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1989).
To compel enforcement of a settlement agreement, its terms must be sufficiently specific and mutually agreed upon as to every essential element....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Samra v. Shaheen Business and Investment Group
... ... Dayna SAMRA, Plaintiff, ... SHAHEEN BUSINESS AND INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., d/b/a SBIG USA, Inc., and ... Kcaled M.A. Chahien, a/k/a Khaled ... Spiegel v. H. Allen Holmes, Inc., 834 So.2d 295, 297 (Fla.App.2002); Williams, ... ...
-
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Rolsafe Int'l, LLC (In re Rolsafe Int'l, LLC)
... ... See In re Lemco Gypsum, Inc., 910 F.2d 784, 788 (11th Cir.1990) (adopting the formulation of related ... Spiegel v. H. Allen Holmes, Inc., 834 So.2d 295, 297 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ... ...
-
Herrera v. Bank of Am., N.A.
... ... 2008) (quoting Anderson v ... Liberty Lobby , Inc ., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986)). A fact is material if it "would affect ... Courts will enforce them when it is possible to do so." Spiegel v ... H ... Allen Holmes , Inc ., 834 So. 2d 295, 297 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ... ...
-
GE Med. Sys. S.C.S. v. SYMX Healthcare Corp.
... ... claims that GE interfered with SYMX's relationship with Americaribe, Inc.[ 2 ] and others. SYMX filed a lawsuit related to its claims against GE ... Courts will enforce them when it is possible to do so." Spiegel v ... H ... Allen Holmes , Inc ., 834 So. 2d 295, 297 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ... ...