Spilman v. State, 5480
Decision Date | 10 September 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 5480,5480 |
Citation | 633 P.2d 183 |
Parties | George E. SPILMAN, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Michael H. Schilling, Appellate Counsel, Wyoming Public Defender Program, Laramie, and Sylvia Lee Hackl, Asst. Public Defender, Wyoming Public Defender Program, Cheyenne, signed the brief on behalf of appellant. Hackl appeared in oral argument.
Steven F. Freudenthal, Atty. Gen.; Gerald A. Stack, Deputy Atty. Gen., Criminal Division; and Allen C. Johnson, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Cheyenne, signed the brief on behalf of appellee. Johnson appeared in oral argument.
Before ROSE, C. J., and RAPER, THOMAS, ROONEY and BROWN, JJ.
This appeal arises from appellant's conviction of murder in the second degree as proscribed by § 6-4-104, W.S.1977. 1 In seeking a reversal of the trial court, appellant has posed two questions for us. These are worded as follows:
We will affirm.
On September 6, 1980, an eighteen-year-old Cheyenne youth hosted a party in the basement of a residence owned and occupied by his seventy-three-year-old grandmother. Appellant George Spilman attended that party. Beer, marijuana, and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) were consumed by those present at the gathering.
At around eight o'clock that night, the party's host gave appellant four "hits" of LSD. 2 The host watched as appellant placed these in his mouth. A short time later, appellant's behavior took an ugly turn. Soon all those present at the party left, leaving appellant alone in the house with the host's grandmother.
Sometime after midnight, appellant's wife arrived at the house. She found appellant in the bathroom covered with blood. He was holding a piece of glass and kneeling over the grandmother's body. After calming her husband down, she managed to leave the house and call the police. The police arrived and arrested appellant.
Appellant was charged with one count of first-degree murder. This was reduced to second-degree murder by the judge presiding at the preliminary hearing. Appellant's trial commenced on January 12, 1981. The voir dire examination of the jury, as well as the opening and closing statements, were not reported. On the evening of January 13, 1981, the jury returned a verdict finding the appellant guilty of second-degree murder. On appeal, the only challenge made to the proceedings concerns the adequacy of trial counsel. Appellant argues: (1) that the standard by which the adequacy of counsel is measured should be one of reasonableness, and (2) that the trial counsel's failure to have the voir dire and the opening and closing statements recorded amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel.
We recently addressed the issue of what standard should be employed to test the adequacy of a criminal defendant's assistance of counsel. In Hoskovek v. State, Wyo., 629 P.2d 1366, 1367 (1981), we stated:
This appears to be precisely the test appellant has sought. Therefore, all we must do is determine whether in this case appellant's trial counsel rendered ineffective or inadequate assistance, based upon a standard of reasonableness.
Appellant bases his claim of ineffective counsel solely upon the failure of his trial counsel to have the voir dire examination and the opening and closing statements reported. Appellant does not contend and has not, at any time, contended that a transcript of those proceedings would establish that error occurred during them. His position is, in effect, that the failure to report those...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Osborn v. State
...to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance.' We have never deviated from these principles. * * * " ' " In Spilman v. State, Wyo., 633 P.2d 183, 185 (1981), it was held that the appellant must demonstrate the unreasonableness of his counsel's actions and an injury which a reason......
-
State ex rel. Hopkinson v. District Court, Teton County
...466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674, reh. denied 467 U.S. 1267, 104 S.Ct. 3562, 82 L.Ed.2d 864 (1984); Spilman v. State, Wyo., 633 P.2d 183 (1981); Hoskovek v. State, Wyo., 629 P.2d 1366 (1981); State v. Rogers, 113 Ariz. 6, 545 P.2d 930 (1976). The dissent in Hopkinson I, 632 P.2d......
-
Hopkinson v. State
...render and rendering reasonably effective assistance.' We have never deviated from these principles. * * * " ' " See also Spilman v. State, Wyo., 633 P.2d 183 (1981) to the same effect. It was added there " * * * Thus, appellant must demonstrate the unreasonableness of trial counsel's actio......
-
Moore v. Moore, 89-261
...custody would be made is prejudicial or injurious to her thus no reversal of the District Court's ruling is warranted. Spilman v. State, 633 P.2d 183 (Wyo.1981). Even if the issues about where the appellant would live and her relationship with Mr. Harvey were discussed ex parte, this discus......