Spivey v. Spivey
Decision Date | 06 September 1947 |
Docket Number | 15918. |
Citation | 44 S.E.2d 224,202 Ga. 644 |
Parties | SPIVEY v. SPIVEY. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. On the trial of an issue arising upon the propounding of a will and a caveat thereto, the burden, in the first instance, is on the propounder to make out a prima facie case, by showing the factum of the will, and that at the time of its execution the testator apparently had sufficient mental capacity to make it, and, in making it, acted freely and voluntarily.
Under the law and the evidence in the present case, a finding in favor of the will was demanded, and the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.
J. G Spivey died on November 14, 1946, leaving a will which was executed on May 14, 1946, and which was offered for probate in solemn form by his son, L. C. Spivey. By the will the testator directed that all his property be reduced to cash and then divided equally among his children, or their survivors. R. R. Spivey, a son, filed a caveat on the ground that the testator, at the time of making the pretended will was not of sound and disposing mind and memory. From a judgment by the court of ordinary in favor of the propounder, the caveator appealed to the superior court, where the jury found in his favor. A motion for new trial was overruled, and the propounder excepted. The sole question presented is whether the evidence on the one issue of mental capacity was sufficient to authorize the verdict.
The evidence submitted on behalf of the propounder is hereafter referred to in the opinion.
The evidence for the caveator on the issue of mental capacity was, in substance, as follows:
Dr. O. C. Wood testified:
Dr. C. B. Fulgham testified:
W. J. Bell testified: On one occasion, in the fall of 1945, Mr. Spivey abused his grandson.
Frank Spivey testified:
W. D. Stribling testified that Mr. Spivey would come by his garage during 1945 and 1946 to catch a bus, but would not recognize him, and he would have to tell him who he was; that he didn't remember seeing Mr. Spivey on May 14, 1946, and didn't know anything about the condition of his mind on that day.
R. R. Spivey testified:
Dr. E F. Griffith testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ware v. Hill
...have mental capacity to make a will. The Brock case, therefore, has no application to the facts of the present case. In Spivey v. Spivey, 202 Ga. 644, 44 S.E.2d 224, Mr. Justice Candler, for the court, set out the medical testimony and the testimony of other witnesses for the caveators, and......
-
Davis v. State
...freely and voluntarily. When this is done, the burden of proof shifts to the caveator." Slaughter v. Heath, supra; Spivey v. Spiv-ey, 202 Ga. 644, 648, 44 S.E.2d 224, 227. This burden was carried by the propounder in producing the testimony of the subscribing witnesses, who had known the te......
-
Whitfield v. Pitts
... ... acted freely and voluntarily. When this is done, the burden ... of proof shifts to the caveator.' Slaughter v. Heath, ... supra; Spivey v. Spivey, 202 Ga. 644, 648, 44 S.E.2d ... 224, 227. This burden was carried by the propounder in ... producing the testimony of the subscribing ... ...
-
Spivey v. Spivey
...44 S.E.2d 224SPIVEY.v.SPIVEY.No. 15918.Supreme Court of Georgia.Sept. 6, 1947.[44 S.E.2d 224]Syllabus by the Court. 1. On the trial of an issue arising upon the propounding of a will and a caveat[44 S.E.2d 225]thereto, the burden, in the first instance, is on the propounder to make out a pr......
-
Making a Prima Facie Case for Solemn Form Probate After Singelman v. Singelman
...or accounted for, even though the will is witnessed by more than the minimum number required by the statute). 12. Spivey v. Spivey, 202 Ga. 644, 44 S.E. 2d 224 Redfearn, supra note 1, at section 6-9. 13. Whitfield v. Pitts, 205 Ga. 259, 53 S.E. 2d 549 (1949). 14. Spivey v. Spivey, 202 Ga. 6......