Spokane County v. Bracht

Decision Date02 October 1900
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesSPOKANE COUNTY v. BRACHT et al., County Com'rs.

Appeal from superior court, Spokane county.

Action by Spokane county, a municipal corporation, against Frank Bracht and others, county commissioners. From an order granting a temporary injunction, both parties appeal. Remanded, with instructions to dismiss.

PER CURIAM.

This was an action brought by the prosecuting attorney of Spokane county, in the name of Spokane county, against the county commissioners of said county, to restrain them from bonding certain alleged warrant indebtedness against the county. Upon the presentation of the case in this court, on June 13, 1900, last, it was suggested by the court that the prosecuting attorney had no authority to bring an action in the name of a county against the county commissioners, and that this action would not lie, and the court refused to hear the case upon its merits. But, before finally deciding, the prosecuting attorney was allowed to file briefs on that particular point. The briefs have been filed, but an examination of them has failed to change our opinion on the proposition involved. The case is therefore remanded, with instructions to the lower court to dismiss the same.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State ex rel. To the Use of Tadlock v. Mooneyham
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 8, 1923
    ... ... 573 STATE OF MISSOURI ex rel. to the Use of T. C. TADLOCK, Prosecuting Attorney of Jasper County, Missouri, Respondent, v. ROBERT A. MOONEYHAM and S. S. NICKS, County Treasurer of Jasper County, ... alleged warrant indebtedness against the county. Spokane ... County v. Bracht, 62 P. 446, 23 Wash. 102. (8) Moreover, ... the county had a direct legal ... ...
  • Osborn v. Grant County By and Through Grant County Com'rs
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • November 27, 1996
    ...in opposition to the orders of the board of county commissioners. Prentice, 54 Wash. at 590-91, 103 P. 831. See also Spokane County v. Bracht, 23 Wash. 102, 62 P. 446 (1900) (prosecuting attorney has no authority to bring an action in the name of a county against the county Harter presented......
  • Prentice v. Franklin County
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • September 2, 1909
    ... ... prosecute this appeal in opposition to the orders of the ... board of county [54 Wash. 591] commissioners. County of ... Spokane v. Bracht, 23 Wash. 102, 62 P. 446 ... The ... appeal is dismissed ... RUDKIN, ... C.J., and CHADWICK, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT