Sprung v. Command Security Corporation
Decision Date | 29 March 2007 |
Docket Number | 646. |
Citation | 38 A.D.3d 478,2007 NY Slip Op 02669,833 N.Y.S.2d 60 |
Parties | ZVI SPRUNG, as Executor of SARA SPRUNG and Another, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION et al., Defendants. JOAN BELINC, as Executrix of RAYMOND D'AMELIO, Deceased, Respondent, v. COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION, Appellant, and AMALGAMATED DWELLINGS, INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Paragraph A of the subject security services agreement provides that the company "shall furnish [owner] with ... Security Personnel [defined as `uniformed or plainclothes guards and/or other security personnel'] at such location or locations from such starting dates and times and during such hours with such special equipment ... as [company] and [owner] shall mutually agree upon in writing." Paragraph E provides, insofar as pertinent:
With respect to the complaint, since the contract does not specify the services to be furnished, it cannot be conclusively determined, on the basis of the documentary evidence (CPLR 3211 [a] [1]) whether the company had "entirely displaced" or "comprehensively absorbed" the owner's common-law duty, if any, to secure the premises against the type of crime that resulted in the deaths of plaintiff's...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Artis v. Random House, Inc.
...390 (1st Dep't 2008); Kinberg v. Kinberg, 50 A.D.3d 512, 513, 858 N.Y.S.2d 113 (1st Dep't 2008); Sprung v. Command Sec. Corp., 38 A.D.3d 478, 479, 833 N.Y.S.2d 60 (1st Dep't 2007). The court may dismiss claims based on such evidence only if plaintiff fails to rebut it. Hicksville Dry Cleane......
-
Davis v. Lancaster
...390 (1st Dep't 2008); Kinberg v. Kinberg, 50 A.D.3d 512, 513, 858 N.Y.S.2d 113 (1st Dep't 2008); Sprung v. Command Sec. Corp., 38 A.D.3d 478, 479, 833 N.Y.S.2d 60 (1st Dep't 2007). The complaint or individual claims may be dismissed based on such evidence unless plaintiff rebuts it. Hicksvi......
-
Wachsman v. Catcendix Corp.
...Arfa v. Zamir, 55 A.D.3d 508, 509 (1st Dep't 2008); Kinberg v. Kinberg, 50 A.D.3d 512, 513 (1st Dep't 2008); Sprung v. Command Sec. Corp., 38 A.D.3d 478, 479 (1st Dep't 2007). The court may dismiss claims based on such evidence only if plaintiffs fail to rebut it. Hicksville Dry Cleaners, I......
-
Artis v. Random House Inc.
...Arfa v. Zamir, 55 A.D.3d 508, 509 (1st Dep't 2008); Kinberg v. Kinberg, 50 A.D.3d 512, 513 (1st Dep't 2008); Sprung v. Command Sec. Corp., 38 A.D.3d 478, 479 (1st Dep't 2007). The court may dismiss claims based on such evidence only if plaintiff fails to rebut it. Hicksville Dry Cleaners, I......