Sprung v. E. I. du Pont De Nemours & Co.
| Decision Date | 15 November 1939 |
| Docket Number | 27706 |
| Citation | 23 N.E.2d 947,136 Ohio St. 94 |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
| Parties | SPRUNG, Adm'x, Appellee, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., Appellant. |
Appeal from Court of Appeals, Franklin County.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Wilbur E. Benoy, all of Columbus, for appellant.
Power & Barton, of Columbus, for appellee.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Appeal dismissed.
WILLIAMS, J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bach v. Friden Calculating Mach. Co.
...of a "managing agent." See also Sprung v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Ohio App., 34 N.E.2d 41, 16 O.O. 352, appeal dismissed, 136 Ohio St. 94, 23 N.E.2d 947; Beach v. Kerr Turbine Co., D.C.N.D. Ohio, 243 F. 706, 711; Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co., 6 Cir., 142 F. 919,......
-
Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.
...of the certifying court. See Sprung, Admx., v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Ohio App., 34 N.E.2d 41, appeal dismissed, 136 Ohio St. 94, 23 N.E.2d 947. Questions certified should have actually arisen and should be necessarily involved in the court's ruling or decision. 5 American Jurispru......