St. Clair v. City Of Macon, 20975.

Decision Date20 July 1931
Docket NumberNo. 20975.,20975.
Citation159 S.E. 758,43 Ga.App. 598
PartiesST. CLAIR. v. CITY OF MACON et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by Editorial Staff.

Error from City Court of Macon; C. H. Hall, Judge.

Action by Naomi St. Clair against the City of Macon and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

R. D. Feagin, H. B. Bell, and J. F. Urquhart, all of Macon, for plaintiff in error.

E. W. Maynard, John J. McCreary, and Ellsworth Hall, Jr., all of Macon, for defendants in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court.

STEPHENS, J.

1. A person who creates or maintains a pond of water upon private premises is under no duty to maintain it in a condition of safety, as against drowning, for children who, with the mere acquiescence and knowledge of the owner but without express or implied invitation, come upon the premises and go in the pond. The doctrine of the "turntable cases" does not apply to such a situation. Savannah, Florida and Western Railway Co. v. Beavers, 113 Ga. 398, 39 S. E. 82, 54 L. R. A. 314; Hargreaves v. Deacon, 25 Mich. 1; Peters v. Bowman, 115 Cal. 345, 47 P. 113, 598, 56 Am. St. Rep. 106; Stendal v. Boyd, 67 Minn. 279, 69 N. W. 899.

2. Where, in such a case, the landowner, and a municipality whose alleged negligence caused an accumulation of water which created the pond, were sued jointly by the mother of a child of nine years of age for loss of services of the child, resulting from its death by drowning in the pond, the petition failed to set out a cause of action against either defendant, and the general demurrer of each defendant was properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

JENKINS, P. J., and BELL, J., concur.

JENKINS, P. J. (concurring specially).

I concur in the result arrived at by my colleagues in this case, but perhaps go further than they do in my idea concerning the law governing it. It is true that section 4420 of the Civil Code (1910) provides that, "where the owner or occupier of land, by express or implied invitation, induces or leads others to come upon his premises for any lawful purpose,, he is liable in damages to such persons for injuries occasioned by his failure to exercise ordinary care in keeping the premises and approaches safe, " but in my opinion even an express or implied invitation to the general public to use gratuitously a privately owned swimming pool would not render the owner thereof liable to any person who might thus use the same, in the absence of proof that it contained some...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Sheley v. Board of Public Ed. for City of Savannah and Chatham County
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 19, 1974
    ...hazards, whether natural or artificial. Savannah, F. & W.R. Co. v. Beavers, 113 Ga. 398, 39 S.E. 82, 54 L.R.A. 314; St. Clair v. City of Macon, 43 Ga.App. 598, 159 S.E. 758; McCall v. McCallie, 48 Ga.App. 99(1), 171 S.E. 843; Crawford v. Pollard, 55 Ga.App. 702, 191 S.E. 162; Fickling v. Ci......
  • Nye v. Union Camp Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Georgia
    • October 30, 1987
    ...come upon the premises and go into the pond." Montega, supra 128 Ga.App. at 337, 196 S.E.2d 459, quoting St. Clair v. City of Macon, 43 Ga.App. 598, 159 S.E. 758 (1931). Nye strives to distinguish his situation by focusing on the allegedly submerged stumps within the lake and by relying on ......
  • Montega Corp. v. Grooms, 47427
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 5, 1973
    ...Torts 2d, § 342; Prosser, Torts (3rd Ed.) Ch. 11, § 60.' Kahn v. Graper, 114 Ga.App. 572, 577, 152 S.E.2d 10; St. Clair v. City of Macon, 43 Ga.App. 598, 159 S.E. 758; Butler v. Brogdon, 110 Ga.App. 352, 138 S.E.2d There is much similarity in the facts and in the positions of the parties he......
  • Morris v. City of Britton
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1938
    ...in an unguarded pond formed in an abandoned quarry, even though it had permitted children to play on the premises. In St. Clair v. City of Macon, 43 Ga. App. 598, the court held that one who created or maintained a pond of water on private premises was under no duty to maintain it in a cond......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT