St. George v. Pinellas County, No. 01-12159.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit) |
Citation | 285 F.3d 1334 |
Docket Number | No. 01-12159. |
Parties | Theresa ST. GEORGE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Michael J. St. George, deceased, Michael St. George, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Michael J. St. George, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PINELLAS COUNTY, Defendant, Everett S. Rice, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pinellas County, Stephen M. Mitchell, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Pinellas County, Defendants-Appellees. |
Decision Date | 21 March 2002 |
v.
PINELLAS COUNTY, Defendant,
Everett S. Rice, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pinellas County, Stephen M. Mitchell, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Pinellas County, Defendants-Appellees.
Page 1335
Robert Woods Merkle, David J. Plante, Merkle & Magri, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Richard Courtney McCrea, Jr., Ryan David Barack, Zinober & McCrea, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Before WILSON, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
HILL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves a seven-count complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Michael and Theresa St. George, parents of deceased seventeen-year-old Michael J. St. George, and the personal representatives of his estate, stemming from the 1997 shooting death of young St. George by Pinellas County, Florida Deputy Sheriff M. Mitchell. The claims allege lack of probable cause, unreasonable seizure, excessive force, unlawful punishment, battery and wrongful death.
We discuss only one of the three issues raised in this appeal1: whether the district court properly granted the defense of qualified immunity to Deputy Sheriff Stephen M. Mitchell in response to his motion to dismiss Counts I and II of the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.2 We conclude that the complaint alleges facts sufficient
Page 1336
to defeat Mitchell's defense of qualified immunity at this stage of the proceedings, and reverse the October 22, 1999, order of the district court and remand for further proceedings.3
According to the complaint, on June 23, 1997, the day of the shooting, a confidential informant (CI) called the Pinellas County Sheriff's office to report gunshots and a tan vehicle containing marijuana plants traveling in the vicinity of Carolina Avenue, Tarpon Springs. The CI called a second time to report that the car was gray, not tan, and was parked behind a convenience store located at the corner of Klosterman Road and Alternate 19. According to the CI, the driver of the gray car was inside the store, wearing shorts, a baseball cap and no shirt. The car's passenger was hiding behind the store.
Three deputies responded to the calls, Mitchell, in his police cruiser, and Deputy Kenneth R. Lilly, Jr. and Corporal Randall M. Jones, in theirs. Lilly and Jones located the gray car at the convenience store and seized passenger Mike Thomas Ralston at gunpoint, placing him in the back of their police cruiser. Mitchell and Jones then searched inside the store and found no one matching the description of the driver. Thereafter the CI called a third time to report that the driver of the car, later identified as Robbie Ryan Robinson, was now running across Alternate 19 in the direction of Carolina Avenue. In an attempt to find Robinson, Mitchell drove toward Carolina Avenue.
In the meantime, St. George and a fifteen-year old female, Jamie Lee King, were inside a residence located at 1970 Carolina Avenue. St. George received a telephone call from an unknown individual. He immediately grabbed a duffel bag, told King he would be right back, and left the house. Capless, and wearing shorts and a t-shirt, St. George did not match the description of the gray car's driver.
About the same time, a neighbor informed Mitchell that an individual had recently fled the residence at 1970 Carolina Avenue in the direction of Pinellas Trail. Mitchell, with side arm drawn, gave chase on foot. Aware that he was being chased, St. George returned to the house and entered through the front door.4 King saw St. George enter the kitchen, seize a holstered gun and a small green box, and reach for the refrigerator door.
As Mitchell approached the house he could see St. George through the open kitchen window. Without specifically looking through the window,5 he shot St.
Page 1337
George twice, one in the left leg and then in the upper left back. The complaint claims that St. George never took any action to threaten Mitchell's safety. After the shots were fired, Mitchell ran around to the front of the house and entered through the front door at or about the same time as Jones. Thereafter paramedics arrived and pronounced St. George dead.
King, observing St. George throughout the entire incident, saw two items on the floor near St. George's body, the holstered gun and a small green box. In documenting the crime scene, the detective in charge noted three items on the kitchen floor, the holster, the gun outside of the holster, and a small green box.
We have jurisdiction to review the grant of the defense of qualified immunity pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). While the defense of qualified immunity is typically addressed at the summary judgment stage of a case, it may be, as it was in this case, raised and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hayden v. Alabama Dep't of Public Safety, Civil Action No. 2:06cv948-ID (WO).
...summary judgment stage of a case, it may be ... raised and considered on a motion to dismiss." Page 947 St. George v. Pinellas County, 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th IV. FACTS The facts in the complaint, which are taken as true for present purposes, are as follows.2 Plaintiff began his employmen......
-
EX PARTE ALABAMA DEPT. OF YOUTH SERVICES
...alleged in the complaint as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor. Id." St. George v. Pinellas County, 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th Cir.2002) (emphasis "`Supervisor liability [under § 1983] occurs either when the supervisor personally participates in the alleged c......
-
Robinson v. Sauls, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:18-cv-131-TCB
...to qualified immunity, ‘an officer need only have arguable probable cause’ to employ deadly force (quoting St. George v. Pinellas Cnty. , 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th Cir. 2002) )); McCormick v. City of Fort Lauderdale , 333 F.3d 1234, 1246 (11th Cir. 2003) (finding that the Constitution "perm......
-
Rebalko v. City of Coral Springs, CASE NO. 19-60569-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt
...on a motion to dismiss is ‘limited to the four corners of the complaint.’ " (quoting 552 F.Supp.3d 1304 St. George v. Pinellas Cty. , 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th Cir. 2002) )). And so, drawing only from the Complaint's averments, the "fresh pursuit" exception does not apply here.Second , an o......
-
Hayden v. Alabama Dep't of Public Safety, Civil Action No. 2:06cv948-ID (WO).
...summary judgment stage of a case, it may be ... raised and considered on a motion to dismiss." Page 947 St. George v. Pinellas County, 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th IV. FACTS The facts in the complaint, which are taken as true for present purposes, are as follows.2 Plaintiff began his employmen......
-
EX PARTE ALABAMA DEPT. OF YOUTH SERVICES
...alleged in the complaint as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor. Id." St. George v. Pinellas County, 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th Cir.2002) (emphasis "`Supervisor liability [under § 1983] occurs either when the supervisor personally participates in the alleged c......
-
Robinson v. Sauls, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:18-cv-131-TCB
...to qualified immunity, ‘an officer need only have arguable probable cause’ to employ deadly force (quoting St. George v. Pinellas Cnty. , 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th Cir. 2002) )); McCormick v. City of Fort Lauderdale , 333 F.3d 1234, 1246 (11th Cir. 2003) (finding that the Constitution "perm......
-
Rebalko v. City of Coral Springs, CASE NO. 19-60569-CIV-ALTMAN/Hunt
...on a motion to dismiss is ‘limited to the four corners of the complaint.’ " (quoting 552 F.Supp.3d 1304 St. George v. Pinellas Cty. , 285 F.3d 1334, 1337 (11th Cir. 2002) )). And so, drawing only from the Complaint's averments, the "fresh pursuit" exception does not apply here.Second , an o......