St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Trotter
Decision Date | 04 December 1911 |
Citation | 142 S.W. 189 |
Parties | ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. TROTTER. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence County; R. E. Jeffery, Judge.
Action by Ada Trotter, by next friend, S. H. McCullough, against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Ada Trotter, 17 years of age, brought this suit by her next friend and stepfather, S. H. McCullough, for damages for a personal injury alleged to have been received, while debarking from a train at Minturn, Ark. It was alleged that as soon as the train stopped and the station was called she started to leave the train, but that before she had time to do so it was started with a sudden jerk, and she was thrown violently against the side of the vestibule, and that after moving forward for some distance it was stopped with a sudden jerk, which again threw plaintiff against the side of the vestibule, injuring and bruising her body and back, and that there was no step or stool placed for her to alight, and the station was dark, and she was unable to see that it was not placed, and that in attempting to alight she was thrown to the ground and further bruised, and her back strained and injured. "And she states and alleges that the defendant company was negligent in starting its train before plaintiff had a reasonable time to alight therefrom in safety, and in starting the same at an unusual rate of speed and with a sudden jerk, and in stopping said train suddenly, and in failing to have its platform lighted where passengers were expected to alight from said train, and in failing to place the step or stool to facilitate her safe departure from said train, and that each and all of the acts of negligence acted together to cause her injury." That by reason of the injury she suffered great pain, and still continues to suffer, and is advised that she will so continue to suffer during her lifetime. That she was a strong, healthy girl before the injury, and able to perform household duties and out of door work, and to earn the sum of $300 per year. That by reason of said injuries she has been confined to her bed, and has incurred doctor's bill to the amount of $75, and, "That she has suffered great pain and still suffers, and that she is permanently disabled from performing any manual labor for the remainder of her life." All to her damage in the sum of $25,000. The answer denied the material allegations of the complaint, alleged that if the plaintiff had been damaged or injured it was caused by her own contributory negligence, and as a result of the risk and hazard which she voluntarily assumed.
The evidence tended to show that she, with her mother, stepfather, and the other four children of the family were passengers on the train from Hoxie to Minturn, Ark., on December 6th, having first procured tickets for the journey. That her father told the brakeman en route that he had his family on the train, and wanted time enough to get off. That the train arrived at Minturn before daylight, about 5 o'clock, and the station was not lighted. She stated:
The 14 year old sister of the plaintiff was not injured, and she was standing behind her at the time of the injury, but had nothing in her arms to prevent her holding, while the plaintiff said she had her father's overcoat and "some other things; had my arms full is the reason I couldn't hold."
It was shown that when the train first stopped some passengers and Mr. McCullough, with a child in his arms, got off. The porter said, "All right," and, as the brakeman said,
The conductor of the train testified that the train came to a stop, and he went to the baggage car to see to the loading and unloading of the baggage, and after it was done there was apparently no one else to get off the chair car, and the porter hollered, "All right," that he was through, and I gave the signal for the engineer to move, which he did. He moved a car length up to the time he stopped. I saw these other people get off. There was no jerk nor jar of the train that I know of. The porter was standing right even with the baggage door when he hollered, "All right," and the brakeman was down where the passengers were alighting.
The baggageman also testified that on the occasion of the stop at Minturn none of the baggage was jarred down in the car, which was right behind the engine; that it was a very unusual thing to have baggage jarred down.
The auditor testified that the train stopped at Minturn on this morning; that there were six or seven passengers unloaded, and he found there were several more to get off the train, and the train was brought to a stop, and the passengers were let off. The train didn't back up any; nor was there any unusual...
To continue reading
Request your trial