St Louis Ry Co v. Gee

Decision Date23 November 1885
Citation6 S.Ct. 123,115 U.S. 469,29 L.Ed. 446
PartiesST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. McGEE. Filed
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

A. T. Britton, A. B. Browne, and Thomas J. Portis, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

WAITE, C. J.

This was an action of ejectment brought by the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company against Hugh McGee, to recover the possession of the N. 1/2 of N. E. 1/4, section 17 township 26, range 11, in Stoddard county, Missouri. The supreme court of Missouri rendered judgment in favor of McGee. To reverse that judgment this writ of error was brought.

The facts are these:

On the ninth of February, 1853, congress passed an act granting certain lands to the states of Arkansas and Missouri to aid in building a railroad from a point on the Mississippi opposite the mouth of the Ohio, by way of Little Rock, to the Texas boundary line near Fulton. 10 St. 155. Sections 4 and 5 of that act are as follows:

'Sec. 4. That the said lands hereby granted to the said states shall be subject to the disposal of the legislatures thereof, for the purposes aforesaid and no other; and the said railroad and branches shall be and remain a public highway for the use of the government of the United States, free from toll or other charge upon the transportation of any property or troops of the United States.

'Sec. 5. That the lands hereby granted to said states shall be disposed of by said states only in the manner following; that is to say, that a quantity of land not exceeding one hundred and twenty sections, and included within a continuous length of twenty miles of said road, may be sold; and when the governors of said state or states shall certify to the secretary of the interior that twenty continuous miles of said road is completed, then another like quantity of land hereby granted may be sold; and so from time to time until said road is completed; and if said road is not completed within ten years, no further sales shall be made, and the land unsold shall revert to the United States.'

The land in dispute is within the limits of this grant. The Cairo & Fulton Railroad of Missouri was incorporated as a railroad company under the laws of Missouri, January 12, 1854, and on the twentieth of February, 1855, the legislature of Missouri passed an act vesting in that company full and complete title to the lands granted to the state by the act of 1853, so far as the same were applicable to the building of the road from the northern boundary of Arkansas to the Mississippi, opposite the mouth of the Ohio. This grant by Missouri was made 'for the uses and purposes, and subject to the condition, reversion and provisions set forth and contained in said act of congress and of this act.' Section 5 is as follows:

'For the purpose of raising funds from time to time for the construction of the said railroad, the said company may sell the said lands, in the manner provided for by said act of congress, and may issue their bonds in such sums as they may deem proper, at rates of interest not exceeding seven per cent. per annum, payable semi-annually, and the principal of said bonds payable at such time and place as they may designate; and may secure the payment of said bonds by mortgage of said lands, or any part thereof, to be executed by said company, and may make the said bonds convertible into land or stock of the company within such periods as they may prescribe; provided, that the faith of the state is in no manner pledged for the redemption of said bonds, or any part thereof: and provided further, that nothing in this act contained shall be construed to authorize said company to sell, dispose of, or apply the said lands, or the proceeds thereof, in any other manner, or to any other purpose, than as required and limited by the said act of congress.' Laws Mo. 1855, 314.

On the third of January, 1859, the company sold and conveyed the land sued for to McGee, who immediately went into possession, and has ever since occupied and improved it as his own, and paid the taxes and assessments thereon. This deed was duly recorded January 10, 1859. The land is more than forty miles from the starting point of the road on the Mississippi, and it does not appear that when it was sold a sufficient number of miles of the road had been built to authorize its sale. On the nineteenth of February, 1866, the legislature of Missouri directed the governor of the state to sell at auction the Cairo & Fulton Railroad of Missouri, so far as the same was 'constructed or projected, together with their appurtenances, rolling-stock, and property of every description, and all rights and franchises thereto belonging,' 'in pursuance of the provisions of the several acts creating a lien on said railroads, their appurtenances, rights, and franchises, in favor of the state.' Laws Mo. 1866-67, 107. On the twenty-eighth of July, 1866, congress enacted that the original act of February 9, 1853, granting lands to the states of Arkansas and Missouri, 'with all the provisions therein made, be, and the same is hereby, revived and extended for the term of ten years from the passage of this act; and all the lands therein granted, which reverted to the United States under the provisions of said act, be, and the same are hereby, restored to the same custody, control, and condition, and made subject to the uses and trusts in all respects as they were before and at the time such reversion took effect: provided, that all mineral lands within the limits of this grant and the grant made in section two of this act, are hereby reserved to the United States: and provided further, that all property and troops of the United States shall at all times be transported over said railroad and branches, at the cost, charge, and expense of the company or corporation owning or operating said road and branches respectively, when so required by the government of the United States.'

By section 2 of the same act an additional grant of lands was made, 'subject to the same uses and trusts, and under the same custody, control, and conditions, and to be held and disposed of in the same manner as if included in the original grant.' It was then provided 'that the lands embraced in this grant and the grant revived by section one of this act shall be disposed of only as follows: Whenever proof shall be furnished, satisfactory to the secretary of the interior, that any section of ten consecutive miles of said road * * * is completed in a good, substantial, and workman-like manner, as a first-class railroad, the secretary of the interior shall issue patents for all the lands granted as aforesaid, not exceeding ten sections per mile opposite to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
41 cases
  • Dugan v. Montoya
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 16 Febrero 1918
    ...Fancoeur v. Newhouse (C. C.) 40 Fed. 618, 14 Sawy. 351; United States v. Curtner (C. C.) 38 Fed. 1; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. McGee, 115 U. S. 479, 6 Sup. Ct. 123, 29 L. Ed. 446; Schow v. Harriman, 154 U. S. 609, 14 Sup. Ct. 1209, 22 L. Ed. 556; Schulenberg v. Harriman, 21 Wall. 44, 2......
  • Horse Creek Conservation District v. Lincoln Land Company
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 11 Julio 1939
    ... ... Harriman, 21 ... Wall. 44, 62-64, 22 L.Ed. 551; Farnsworth v. Minnesota, ... etc. Ry., 92 U.S. 49, 66-68, 23 L.Ed. 530; McMicken ... v. United States, 97 U.S. 204, 218, 24 L.Ed. 947; ... Bybee v. Oregon, etc., Ry., 139 U.S. 663, 674-677, ... 11 S.Ct. 641, 35 L.Ed. 305; St. Louis, etc. Ry. v ... McGee, 115 U.S. 469, 472-475, 6 S.Ct. 123, 29 L.Ed. 446; ... Railroad Co. v. Mingus, 165 U.S. 413, 430-434, 17 S.Ct. 348, ... 41 L.Ed. 770." ... Of ... similar purport is the case of Spokane & British [54 ... Wyo. 341] Columbia Railway Co. v. Washington & Great ... ...
  • Dugan v. Montoya
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 16 Febrero 1918
    ...Newhouse (C. C.) 40 F. 618, 14 Sawy. 351; United States v. Curtner (C. C.) 38 F. 1; St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. McGee, 115 U.S. 479, 6 S.Ct. 123, 29 L.Ed. 446; Schow v. Harriman, 154 U.S. 609, 14 S.Ct. 1209, 22 L.Ed. 556; Schulenberg v. Harriman, 21 Wall. 44, 22 L.Ed. 551; Van Wyck v. K......
  • Wilson v. Beckwith
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 29 Junio 1897
    ... 41 S.W. 985 140 Mo. 359 Wilson, by Next Friend, v. Beckwith, Appellant Supreme Court of Missouri June 29, 1897 ...           Appeal ... from St. Louis City Circuit Court. -- Hon. Leroy B. Valliant, ...           ... Reversed and remanded (with directions) ...          Martin ... L. Clardy for appellants ...          (1) The ... fact that this case was retried in accordance with the ... principles announced in ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT