St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Mallard
Decision Date | 03 June 1912 |
Citation | 148 S.W. 261 |
Parties | ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. v. MALLARD. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Woodruff County; Hance N. Hutton, Judge.
Action by John Mallard against the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, unless a remittitur for $2,000 be entered.
S. H. West, of St. Louis, Mo., and J. C. Hawthorne, of Jonesboro, for appellant. C. F. Greenlee, of Brinkley, for appellee.
The plaintiff, John Mallard, instituted this action against the railway company to recover damages on account of a personal assault, alleged to have been made on him by the conductor of one of defendant's trains while he was a passenger thereon. He recovered damages below, and the company has appealed.
Plaintiff is a colored man, about 55 years old, a farmer, and resided in Woodruff county, Ark., at the time the incident occurred which is the subject of this inquiry. He had been sick for nearly eight months, most of the time being unable to work or attend to his farm duties, and on July 20, 1911, he took passage on one of defendant's passenger trains at Hilleman, in Woodruff county, to go to Fargo, which is a station in Monroe county. He states that just before the train reached Fargo the conductor, without provocation, assaulted him, inflicted several slight, but painful, wounds with a knife, and pushed or threw him down across a seat, causing his arm to be broken. The following is his testimony concerning the occurrence, which took place while he was in the coach set apart for colored passengers: He testified that he suffered great pain, and other witnesses who saw him get off the train say he appeared to suffer greatly,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pine Bluff & Arkansas River Railway Company v. Washington
...109 Ark. 29, 31; 106 Ark. 177; 163 S.W. 107. 7. The verdict both for actual and compensatory damages, is grossly excessive. 148 S.W. 261; 90 Ark. 107; 102 Ark. 499; 98 425; 87 Ark. 109. T. Havis Nixon and Coleman & Gantt, for appellee. 1. No antecedent authority nor subsequent ratification ......