St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Painton
Decision Date | 13 August 1925 |
Docket Number | No. 3754.,3754. |
Citation | 275 S.W. 55 |
Parties | ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. v. PAINTON. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Stoddard County; W. S. C. Walker, Judge.
Action by the St. Louis Southwestern Rail, way Company against A. Painton. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.
Casper M. Edwards, of Malden, for appellant.
John R. Turney and A. H. Kiskaddon, both of St. Louis, and Wammack & Welborn, of Bloomfield, for respondent.
This suit is on a, contract to recover for freight charges, and was tried before the court without a jury. Plaintiff recovered, and defendant appealed.
The suit was filed against M. C. Townley and A. Painton, doing business under the firm name of Townley & Painton. Townley died before trial, and dismissal was made as to him, and the cause proceeded against Painton. It is alleged that, by virtue of a certain contract entered into between plaintiff and defendants on October 8, 1916, defendants were indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $2,886.35. Recovery is sought for operations under the contract from October 8, 1916, to September 27, 1917.
Defendant's chief defense is that the tariff upon which the contract was based was not filed with the Public Service Commission, as required by law, and was therefore illegal and void, and that said tariff would not support a valid contract. No reply appears in the record, but no point is made in that respect. Defendant makes many assignments, but the decisive question presented is plaintiff's right to recover in a suit on the contract.
The firm of Townley & Painton, at the time the contract was executed, was operating at Malden, Mo., a factory or mill wherein they manufactured shingles, mop handles, chair stock, etc. The contract sued on is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crockett v. City of Mexico
... ... The courts of this State have so held in numerous cases. St. Louis v. Life Ins. Co., 107 Mo. 97; Baustain v. Young, 152 Mo. 317; Ford v. Kansas City, 181 Mo. 147; ... ...
-
Callaway v. Newman Mercantile Co.
... ... Pellissier, 204 P. 224; ... Mancuso v. Kansas City, 74 Mo.App. 40; Merrit v ... St. Louis, 83 Mo. 255; Stevens v. Walpole, 76 ... Mo.App. 213; Perrigo v. St. Louis, 185 Mo. 287; ... ...
-
Crockett v. City of Mexico
... ... The courts of this ... State have so held in numerous cases. St. Louis v. Life ... Ins. Co., 107 Mo. 97; Baustain v. Young, 152 ... Mo. 317; Ford v. Kansas City, ... ...
-
Rauh v. Interco, Inc.
... ... Denied Dec. 23, 1985 ... Mark Michael Anson, Robert F. Wiegert, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant ... Thomas J. Casey, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent ... ...