St. Mary's Church of Schuyler v. Tomek, 82-230

Decision Date22 October 1982
Docket NumberNo. 82-230,82-230
Citation325 N.W.2d 164,212 Neb. 728
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
PartiesST. MARY'S CHURCH OF SCHUYLER, a Nebraska nonprofit corporation, and St. Anthony's Church of Columbus, a Nebraska nonprofit corporation, Appellants, v. William E. TOMEK et al., Appellees.

Syllabus by the Court

Attorney and Client. A lawyer owes a duty to his client to use reasonable care and skill in the discharge of his duties, but ordinarily this duty does not extend to third parties.

Douglas R. Milbourn of Tessendorf, Milbourn, Fehringer & Bothe, P.C., Columbus, for appellants.

William J. Mueller of Sodoro, Daly & Sodoro, Omaha, for appellees.

Heard before KRIVOSHA, C.J., HASTINGS, and CAPORALE, JJ., RIST, District Judge, and COLWELL, District Judge, Retired.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-appellants, St. Mary's Church of Schuyler and St. Anthony's Church of Columbus, seek reversal of the trial court's orders which sustained the demurrers of defendants-appellees, William E. Tomek, John G. Tomek, and Tomek and Tomek, to plaintiffs' amended petition, dismissed same upon plaintiffs' election to stand thereon, and denied plaintiffs' motion for new trial. We affirm.

The operating petition alleges defendants negligently prepared the last will and testament of the decedent, Emil L. Kavan, by failing to accurately express decedent's wishes, as the proximate result of which plaintiffs have been damaged. It is alleged that the decedent instructed defendants to so prepare his will as to distribute the residue of his estate to plaintiffs, share and share alike. The petition also alleges the conclusion that plaintiffs were beneficiaries of the attorney-client relationship entered into between defendants and decedent. Defendants demurred on the grounds the amended petition failed to state a cause of action and that it contained a misjoinder of causes of action, arguing that both tort and contract causes were combined as one.

The will in question included the following provision: "After the payment of all taxes, expenses of administration and proper charges allowed against my estate that have been paid I direct that the rest residue and remainder of the money in my bank account be paid equally among Saint Mary's Church, Schuyler, Nebraska and Saint Anthony's Church, Columbus, Nebraska." Because of a dispute among plaintiffs and decedent's heirs as to the meaning of this language, an action to construe the will was brought in the county court. That court ruled the clause...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Brooks v. Zebre
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1990
    ...of a privity non-liability rule to the damaged beneficiaries when a will was negligently prepared. St. Mary's Church of Schuyler v. Tomek, 212 Neb. 728, 325 N.W.2d 164 (1982). Ames Bank, 287 N.W.2d 687 held there was no duty to the guarantors for his client. Landrigan, 420 N.W.2d 313.12 "Th......
  • Barcelo v. Elliott
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • May 10, 1996
    ...744 P.2d at 1292.1 See Williams v. Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, 774 S.W.2d 847, 849 (Mo.Ct.App.1989); St. Mary's Church v. Tomek, 212 Neb. 728, 325 N.W.2d 164, 165 (1982); Viscardi v. Lerner, 125 A.D.2d 662, 510 N.Y.S.2d 183, 185 (1986); Simon v. Zipperstein, 32 Ohio St.3d 74, 512 N......
  • In re Estate of Drwenski
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • January 28, 2004
    ...v. Elliott, 923 S.W.2d 575 (Tex.1996); Simon v. Zipperstein, 32 Ohio St.3d 74, 512 N.E.2d 636 (1987); and St. Mary's Church of Schuyler v. Tomek, 212 Neb. 728, 325 N.W.2d 164 (1982). Weighing whether to adopt such a duty, the South Dakota court explained the disinclination to allow a noncli......
  • Leak-Gilbert v. Fahle, 97,540.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • July 16, 2002
    ...214 Neb. 728, 335 N.W.2d 554, 555 (1983) [Attorney's duty does not extend to heir who was not client]; St. Mary's Church of Schuyler v. Tomek, 212 Neb. 728, 325 N.W.2d 164, 165 (1982) [Attorney who prepared will had no duty to purported beneficiaries of the will.]; Spivey v. Pulley, 138 A.D......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Avoiding a Will Contest - the Impossible Dream?
    • United States
    • Creighton University Creighton Law Review No. 34, 2000
    • Invalid date
    ...Destroyed by Death, 55 IOWA L. REV. 376, 377 (1969). 161. Jaworski, 10 BAYLOR L. REV. at 97. 162. St. Mary's Church of Schuyler v. Tomek, 212 Neb. 728, 325 N.W.2d 164 (1982). * Piet Schreuders. ...
  • Avoiding a Will Contest - the Impossible Dream?
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 34, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...Destroyed by Death, 55 IOWA L. REV. 376, 377 (1969). 161. Jaworski, 10 BAYLOR L. REV. at 97. 162. St. Mary's Church of Schuyler v. Tomek, 212 Neb. 728, 325 N.W.2d 164 (1982). * Piet Schreuders. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT