St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Circle Bar J Boys' Ranch, Inc., 15--40109

Decision Date26 November 1969
Docket NumberNo. 15--40109,15--40109
Citation1 Wn.App. 377,461 P.2d 567
PartiesST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurer, Appellant, v. The CIRCLE BAR J BOYS' RANCH, INC., a domestic corporation; and Lloyd V. Woleslagel and Jane Doe Woleslagel, husband and wife; and William Meese, Respondents.
CourtWashington Court of Appeals

Lawrence Monbleau of Cashatt, Williams, Connelly & Rekofke, Spokane, for appellant.

Howard K. Michaelsen, John G. Layman and Brian G. Kennedy of Turner, Stoeve & Layman, and Daniel W. Giboney, Spokane, for respondents.

MUNSON, Judge.

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, plaintiff, appeals from a declaratory judgment which held it was obliged: (1) to defend defendant Circle Bar J Boys' Ranch, Inc., hereinafter referred to as though it were the sole defendant, against litigation which might arise as a result of an accident of September 17, 1965; and (2) to pay any sums, subject to the policy's limits, adjudged to be owing any person arising from injuries suffered by William Meese in said accident.

In December of 1964, the defendant, a foster home for delinquent boys, purchased from plaintiff a three-year comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance policy. Only two portions thereof were potentially applicable to the instant case: (1) Coverage A, under which the policy insured defendant for liability imposed from the ownership, maintenance or use of its automobiles; and (2) Coverage B, which insured defendant for liability imposed from other than the ownership, maintenance or use of automobiles. Attached to the policy was the following endorsement:

IT IS AGREED THAT THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THIS POLICY SHALL NOT APPLY WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIM ARISING FROM ACCIDENTS WHICH OCCUR WHILE ANY AUTOMOBILE IS BEING OPERATED BY ANY PERSON UNDER 25 YEARS OF AGE.

On September 17, 1965, upon a public highway approximately three miles from the premises of defendant, its employee, Lloyd Woleslagel, aged 21, was driving the insured's 1954 pickup truck equipped with a plywood canopy mounted over its bed. The canopy, which formed a part of this vehicle, had benches on each side on which passengers could be seated and was used in transporting defendant's wards. William Meese and another juvenile ward were riding in the truck, under this canopy, as it proceeded towards Spokane, Washington, on ranch business. The canopy came loose and, while the two boys were attempting to attract Woleslagel's attention, fell off the truck, taking Meese with it, to his injury. At the trial it was established that the canopy had been improperly assembled and mounted on the truck bed a short time prior to its departure from the premises of defendant.

The evidence clearly establishes defendant was aware of the policy's restrictive endorsement pertaining to age. At the time of issuance of the policy defendant had no employees under the age of 25 years. However, it was defendant's interpretation that the exclusion referred only to its wards, whose age span was from 15 to 18 years of age, and not its employees. Mike Wiley, the original founder of the ranch and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Szczeklik v. Markel Int'l Ins. Co., Case No. 8:12–CV–970–T–27TGW.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 30 April 2013
    ...block away from insureds' residence, even though entrustment itself occurred on premises); St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Circle Bar J Boys' Ranch, Inc., 1 Wash.App. 377, 461 P.2d 567, 569 (1969) (coverage does not apply “to the ownership, maintenance or use including loading or unloadi......
  • Viking Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. Hill
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 22 March 1990
    ...But see Continental Cas. Co. v. Weaver, 48 Wash.App. 607, 613, 739 P.2d 1192 (1987); St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Circle Bar J Boys' Ranch, Inc., 1 Wash.App. 377, 379, 461 P.2d 567 (1969), review denied, 77 Wash.2d 962 ...
  • Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Wiscomb
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 31 December 1980
    ...have upheld other exclusionary clauses in insurance policies against just such a charge. In St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Circle Bar J Boys' Ranch, Inc., 1 Wash.App. 377, 461 P.2d 567 (1969), for example, the court approved as valid an endorsement in a policy excluding coverage for any......
  • Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Wiscomb
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 8 April 1982
    ...with who is driving the vehicle, but on which parties are injured. To illustrate, in St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Circle Bar J Boys' Ranch, Inc., 1 Wash.App. 377, 461 P.2d 567 (1969), the court approved an exclusion which relieved the insurer from coverage when any automobile was driv......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company v. Wiscomb: Excluding the Family Exclusion Clause
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 6-03, March 1983
    • Invalid date
    ...Id. 70. To illustrate, the Wiscomb II court cited St Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Circle Bar J Boys' Ranch, Inc., 1 Wash. App. 377, 461 P.2d 567 (1969), petition denied, 77 Wash. 2d 962 (1970). Wiscomb II, 97 Wash. 2d at 209, 643 P.2d at 444. 71. As an example, the Wiscomb // court cite......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT