St. Stephens Baptist Church, Inc. v. Salzman

Decision Date13 February 2007
Docket Number2006-01228.
Citation2007 NY Slip Op 01288,37 A.D.3d 589,830 N.Y.S.2d 248
PartiesST. STEPHENS BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., Appellant, v. STANLEY P. SALZMAN, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues on the date the alleged malpractice was committed, not when it was discovered (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166 [2001]; Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 95 [1982]; Sommers v Cohen, 14 AD3d 691, 692 [2005]; Barbieri v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisi, Corker, & Sauer, 304 AD2d 512 [2003]). This legal malpractice action arises out of the defendant's alleged failure to defend the plaintiff in an underlying arbitration proceeding resulting in a default judgment against it. As the time to file an answer in the underlying proceeding expired on October 22, 2001, the plaintiff's cause of action accrued on that date (see Glamm v Allen, supra at 93; Williams v Lindenberg, 24 AD3d 434 [2005]; Sommers v Cohen, supra). This action was commenced on April 25, 2005, more than three years later, and therefore was time-barred (see CPLR 214 [6]).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are academic in light of our determination.

Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Farage v. Ehrenberg
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 19, 2014
    ...562, 988 N.Y.S.2d 591 ; Lincoln Place, LLC v. RVP Consulting, Inc., 70 A.D.3d 594, 896 N.Y.S.2d 47 ; St. Stephens Baptist Church, Inc. v. Salzman, 37 A.D.3d 589, 590, 830 N.Y.S.2d 248 ). However, “causes of action alleging legal malpractice which would otherwise be barred by the statute of ......
  • Quinn v. McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 27, 2016
    ...646 [citations omitted]; see McCoy v. Feinman, 99 N.Y.2d 295, 301, 755 N.Y.S.2d 693, 785 N.E.2d 714 ; St. Stephens Baptist Church, Inc. v. Salzman, 37 A.D.3d 589, 590, 830 N.Y.S.2d 248 ). Causes of action alleging legal malpractice which would otherwise be barred by the statute of limitatio......
  • Soto v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 13, 2007

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT