Stagner v. Wyoming State Tax Commission, 5630
Decision Date | 06 April 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 5630,5630 |
Citation | 642 P.2d 1296 |
Parties | Clyde F. STAGNER, d/b/a West Route Trading Company, Appellant (Petitioner), v. WYOMING STATE TAX COMMISSION and State Board of Equalization, Appellees(Respondents). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
David C. Marion and Carol Herman, Wind River Legal Services, Inc., Fort Washakie, for appellant.
Steven F. Freudenthal, Atty. Gen., Ronald P. Arnold and Philip A. Nicholas, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.
Before ROSE, C. J., and RAPER, THOMAS, ROONEY and BROWN, JJ.
Appellant petitioned the district court for judicial review of appellees' action in seizing some cigarettes which were consigned to appellant on the Wind River Indian Reservation. The seizure was made pursuant to §§ 39-6-101 through 39-6-110, W.S.1977 1 (re levy and collection of excise tax on cigarettes). The cause was dismissed by the district court, and appellant appeals from the order of dismissal.
We affirm.
One of the grounds for dismissal of the petition for review was the fact that it was not timely filed. Timely filing of a petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional. Department of Revenue and Taxation v. Irvine, Wyo., 589 P.2d 1295 (1979); and Snell v. Ruppert, Wyo., 541 P.2d 1042 (1975).
Judicial review of administrative action is governed by Rule 12, W.R.A.P. Rule 12.01, W.R.A.P., provides:
"To the extent that judicial review of administrative action by a district court is available, any person who is aggrieved or adversely affected in fact by a final decision of an agency in a contested case, or who is aggrieved or adversely affected in fact by any other agency action or inaction, or who is adversely affected in fact by a rule adopted by agency, may obtain such review as provided in this rule."
Rule 12.04, W.R.A.P., provides in pertinent part "In a contested case, or in a noncontested case where a statute places a time limit on appeal, the petition for review shall be filed within thirty (30) days after written, certified notice to all parties of the final decision of the agency or denial of the petition for a rehearing, or, if a rehearing is held, within thirty (30) days after written, certified notice to all parties of the decision thereon, except that upon a showing of excusable neglect based upon the failure of a party to learn of the decision or action, the district court may extend the time for filing the petition for review not exceeding thirty (30) days from the expiration of the original time herein prescribed. * * * "
The extent to which such review is available is prescribed by statute:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harrington's Estate, Matter of, 5606
...from Texas estate assets. Due process in all respects was present. In the recent opinion in Stagner v. Wyoming State Tax Commission and State Board of Equalization, Wyo., 642 P.2d 1296 (1982) it was held that the law is elementary that whatever puts a party on inquiry amounts to "notice," c......
-
Lindstrom v. District Bd. of Health Panhandle Dist. I
...651 P.2d 125 (Okla.1982); Tarabochia v. Town of Gig Harbor, 28 Wash.App. 119, 622 P.2d 1283 (1981); and Stagner v. Wyoming State Tax Commission, 642 P.2d 1296 (Wyo.1982). The parties cannot waive appellant's failure to timely file an appeal. Herrett v. Herrett, 105 Idaho 358, 670 P.2d 63 (C......
-
Joelson v. City of Casper, Wyo., 83-173
...filing of a petition for review 3 of the final order or decision of an agency is mandatory and jurisdictional. Stagner v. Wyoming State Tax Commission, Wyo., 642 P.2d 1296 (1982); Department of Revenue and Taxation v. Irvine, Wyo., 589 P.2d 1295 (1979); Snell v. Ruppert, Wyo., 541 P.2d 1042......
-
White v. Board of Trustees of Western Wyoming Community College Dist.
...notice waives any complaint about its insufficiency. As recently announced in this court's opinion in Stagner v. Wyoming State Tax Commission, Wyo., 642 P.2d 1296 (1982), it was stated that the law is elementary that whatever puts a party on inquiry amounts to "notice," citing Rodin v. Stat......
-
011-4 Wyo. Code R. § 4-2 Purpose of the Rules
...business with Indians on or within Indian Reservations, and to codify the mandates set forth in Stagner v. Wvoming State Tax Commission 642 P.2d 1296...