Staman v. Board of Assessors of Chatham
Citation | 351 Mass. 479,221 N.E.2d 861 |
Parties | Eleanor W. STAMAN et al., trustees, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF CHATHAM (and nineteen companion cases 1 ). |
Decision Date | 12 December 1966 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Gerald T. O'Hara, Boston, (John L. Simonds, Boston, with him) for the taxpayers.
Donald R. Grant, Boston, for the Board of Assessors of Chatham.
Before WILKINS, C.J., and SPALDING, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.
The trustees of the will of Avis A.M. Chase (the testatrix), late of Philadelphia, filed petitions with the Appellate Tax Board because aggrieved by the refusal of the Chatham assessors to treat the trust real estate in that town as exempt from taxation. The board's decisions were in favor of the assessors. From those decisions, the trustees appealed. The cases were heard by the board on the pleadings and a statement of agreed facts.
The testatrix's will, theretofore allowed in Pennsylvania, also was allowed in Massachusetts in 1954, as a foreign will, by the Barnstable Probate Court. The trustees have been appointed as such by a Register of Wills in Pennsylvania and by the Probate Court for Barnstable County.
The testatrix at her death owned nine parcels of land and three frame buildings in Chatham. All the parcels are sued in connection with each other and only for the charitable purposes mentioned below.
The will left the residue (including the land and buildings in Chatham and the related furnishings) to the testamentary trustees in trust to pay (subject to certain annuities) the net income to maintain the real estate and to 2
Two of the annuitants have died. Four others, born in the period 1883--1898, are still alive. On March 13, 1964, the residuary trust, not including the Chatham properties, had a market value in excess of $712,000.
From 1959 on,
The premises ordinarily can accommodate sixteen to eighteen guests. On 'weekends extra cots may be placed in the living reems.' The number of women using the property for one or two-week periods rose from twenty-eight in 1959 to eighty-two in 1963.
The Philadelphia YWCA had in the years 1959 to 1963 between 13,530 and 15,092 members. It is 'a charitable corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania and is an affiliated unit of the * * * (YWCA) of the United States of America.' The purposes of the YWCA are: The by-laws state that any woman or girl twelve years of age or more may become a member if she pays her membership dues. Annual dues for the years 1962 and 1963 were $3 for adults and $1 for children.
'The trustees * * * have construed the words 'from Philadelphia and its vicinity' in * * * the will to include' not only Philadelphia but also certain surrounding communities. This area had a total population of 4,115,101 in 1960.
The executors of the estate had their first account allowed and the trustees have had their first and second accounts allowed. In each instance this has been done by the Barnstable Probate Court, after notice to all parties interested and to the Attorney General of Massachusetts.
1. Although the will does not in explicit terms confine the beneficiaries of the trust to women themselves indigent or financially unable to provide vacations for themselves, the will as a whole suggests that the beneficiaries are to be an indefinite class of persons needing 'rest and recreation' and deserving of help. Some indications of a charitable purpose, and of an intention to help suitable recipients of charitable benefits, are (a) the limitation of the beneficiaries to members of the Philadelphia YWCA, a charitable organization for the promotion of Christian living (see Restatement 2d: Trusts, § 369, comments c and d; see also Springfield Y.M.C.A v. Board of Assessors of City of Springfield, 284 Mass. 1, 5--8, 187 N.E. 104); (b) the permission given to the trustees to spend money 'for the food and other reasonable living expenses of the' vacationing women which suggests that there will be a need for such assistance; and (c) the gifts over of income and principal to the Philadelphia YWCA (or, as a substitute, the Boston YWCA, see fn. 2).
It is characteristic of a valid charitable trust that the designated beneficiaries constitute an indefinite class described scribed reasonably. See Restatement 2d: Trusts, § 375; Scott, Trusts (2d ed.) § 375.2. The class need not be large. See Sears v. Attorney Gen., 193 Mass. 551, 553, 79 N.E. 772; Rogers v. Attorney Gen., 347 Mass. 126, 133, 196 N.E.2d 855. See also Masonic Educ. & Charity Trust v. City of Boston, 201 Mass. 320, 325, 87 N.E. 602; Brady v. Ceaty, 349 Mass. 180, 182, 207 N.E.2d 49. In the opinion of a majority of the court the class of beneficiaries of the Chase charitable truse is sufficiently large.
Some aspects of recreation have been recognized as appropriate purposes of a charitable trust, particularly when made generally available to the whole public of a community or a large segment of the community. See Assessors of Quincy v. Cunningham Foundation, 305 Mass. 411, 412--413, 26 N.E.2d 335; Peakes v. Blakely, 333 Mass. 281, 285, 130 N.E.2d 564 (cultivation of forests); Nickols v. Commissioners of Middlesex County, 341 Mass. 13, 15, 18--20, 23--25, 166 N.E.2d 911 ( ); City of Salem v. Attorney Gen., 344 Mass. 626, 629--631, 183 N.E.2d 859, 861 (). See also Town of Norwood v. Norwood Civic Ass'n, 340 Mass. 518, 524--525, 165 N.E.2d 124 ( ). Indeed, in a period when leisure time is increasing, special importance attaches to charitable gifts affording to the public and, to some extent (see Scott, Trusts (2d ed.) § 375.2) to indefinite groups in the public, opportunities for wholesome rest and recreation.
Where there is some relief of poverty, assistance or benefit to the less privileged, promotion of the health or the general welfare of a group, or other similar special advancement of deserving persons, gifts for the assistance of a described indefinite class have been said to be charitable, even where the benefits may have been in part recreation. See Bowditch v Attorney Gen., 241 Mass. 168, 175--176, 134 N.E. 796, 800, 28 A.L.R. 713 ( ); Worcester County Trust Co. v. Grand Knight of the Knights of Columbus, 325 Mass. 748, 751, 753, 92 N.E.2d 579 ( ); Restatement 2d: Trusts, § 374, comments f and g (which says that a 'trust to afford facilities to working girls for a fresh air vacation * * * is charitable'). 3 See also somewhat related cases involving homes for stated indefinite classes of beneficiaries, Thornton v. Franklin Square House, 200 Mass. 465, 466--467, 86 N.E. 909, 22 L.R.A.,N.S., 486 ( ); Clark v. Mayor of Gloucester, 336 Mass. 631, 632, 147 N.E.2d 191 ( ); M.I.T. Student House, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of Boston, 350 Mass. 539, 215 N.E.2d 788; Bogert Trusts and Trustees (2d ed.) §§ 373--374, 379. 4 As to the YWCA as a charitable venture, see Bailey v. Young Women's Christian Assn. of Philadelphia, 266 Pa. 255, 256, 109 A. 690 ( ); Scott, Trusts (2d ed.) §§ 374.11, 375.2. We construe this trust as one for the benefit of deserving members and beneficiaries of the YWCA, a charitable arganization, to be selected responsibly (on the basis of their need and deserts) to receive some of the amenities of rest and recreation in pleasant seaside surroundings which they...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Blixt v. Blixt
...constitutionality "should be avoided if reasonable principles of interpretation permit doing so" (emphasis added). Staman v. Assessors of Chatham, 351 Mass. 479, 487 (1966). "A statute, of course, must be construed, if possible, to avoid serious constitutional doubts. This principle, howeve......
-
Langone v. Secretary of Com.
...it." School Comm. of Greenfield v. Greenfield Educ. Ass'n, 385 Mass. 70, 79-80, 431 N.E.2d 180 (1982). Staman v. Assessors of Chatham, 351 Mass. 479, 486-487, 221 N.E.2d 861 (1966). We discuss below our reasons for concluding that constitutional considerations require the second constructio......
-
First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Attorney General
...... Assessors of Newton v. Pickwick Ltd. Inc., 351 Mass. 621, 223 N.E.2d 388. A ...Bonoit, 347 Mass. 1, 6, 196 N.E.2d 228; Staman v. Assessors . Page 543 . of Chatham, 351 Mass. 479, 486--487, 221 ......
-
Commonwealth v. McGhee
...permit doing so.’ ” Commonwealth v. Disler, 451 Mass. 216, 228, 884 N.E.2d 500 (2008), quoting Staman v. Assessors of Chatham, 351 Mass. 479, 487, 221 N.E.2d 861 (1966). The defendants first contend that G.L. c. 265, § 50 (a ), is unconstitutionally vague as applied to them and, therefore, ......