Stanley v. Wells Fargo Bank, 5D05-4224.
| Decision Date | 18 August 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D05-4224.,5D05-4224. |
| Parties | Ida Jerry STANLEY a/k/a Ida J. Stanley, et al., Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, et al., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Marilyn J. Adler and Stephen J. Braun, of Legal Advocacy Center of Central Florida, Inc., Ocala, for Appellant.
Forrest G. McSurdy, of Stern & McSurdy, P.A., Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A., Plantation, for Appellee.
Ida J. Stanley appeals the summary final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Wells Fargo Bank. On appeal, Ms. Stanley contends that the pleadings and evidence of record failed to substantiate Wells Fargo's ownership of the note and mortgage that are the subject of the foreclosure proceedings. We disagree for several reasons.
First, Wells Fargo filed the original note and mortgage with the court, which strongly suggests its ownership. Secondly, its affidavits averred to its ownership of the note and mortgage. Finally, the record contains an assignment of the note and mortgage to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., and printouts from the comptroller's office, showing various name changes undergone by Norwest so that it is now known as Wells Fargo Bank.
We acknowledge that the information from the comptroller was not in affidavit form. However, the record contains no transcript of the hearing. As a result, we do not know if any objection was made to the court's consideration of that information. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). We assume, therefore, that the trial court properly considered it.
Finding no error, we affirm the summary judgment of foreclosure.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Citibank v. Dalessio
...of an assignment from the payee to the plaintiff. Verizzo v. Bank of N.Y., 28 So.3d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Stanley v. Wells Fargo Bank, 937 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Here, Citibank demonstrated at trial that it is the holder of the promissory note executed by Dalessio that serves as t......
-
Gee v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n
...to prove its status as a holder of the note. See Verizzo v. Bank of N.Y., 28 So.3d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Stanley v. Wells Fargo Bank, 937 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Here, the record does not contain the original Mortgage. To prove its ownership, U.S. Bank filed a copy of the Mortgage ......
-
Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. D'Amore, Case No: 2:13-cv-373-FtM-38CM
...to prove its status as a holder of the note.") (citing Verizzo v. Bank of N.Y., 28 So.3d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Stanley v. Wells Fargo Bank, 937 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)). BB&T has provided an affidavit and exhibits that the Court finds areadmissible and sufficient to prove BB&T is th......
-
Servedio v. US Bank Nat'l Ass'n
...to prove its status as a holder of the note. Verizzo v. Bank of N.Y., 28 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Stanley v. Wells Fargo Bank, 937 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). The record on appeal does not contain the original note, evidence of an assignment of the mortgage and note to appellee, o......