Stanley v. Whitmire, 29563
Decision Date | 11 February 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 29563,29563 |
Citation | 212 S.E.2d 845,233 Ga. 675 |
Parties | Norma Whitmire STANLEY v. Joe F. WHITMIRE et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Robinson, Harben & Armstrong, Sam S. Harben, Jr., Gainesville, for appellant.
Perry S. Oliver, Gainesville, Rich, Bass, Kidd & Witcher, Casper Rich, Decatur, for appellees.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Norma Whitmire Stanley appeals from a judgment denying her specific performance and other relief in her action against the executors of her father's estate. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts.
The will of Ferd Nelson Whitmire appointed his two sons, Joe F. Whitmire and John N. Whitmire, as executors. The testator's property was given equally to his children.
On November 12, 1973, the attorney representing the executors mailed a letter to each of the heirs, except the executors, which stated in part as follows:
On November 30, 1973, the executors opened the bids, prepared a written compilation of the bids, and in the presence of all of the heirs who submitted bids, or their representatives, announced that the following bids constituted the highest bids submitted and would be considered as the purchasers of the property, tracts 1 and 2, Mrs. Norma Stanley, and tract 3, Mrs. Helda Daniel. The total of these bids was $75,503. The second highest bid was the of Mrs. Ruth Rogers and Ralph Rogers, which was $75,101 for all three tracts.
The agreed statement of facts stipulated that:
On December 3, 1973, Mrs. Nelda W. Daniel and Grady R. Daniel wrote the executors that they were withdrawing their bid. On December 13, 1973, the executors notified Mrs. Stanley and Mrs. Ruth Rogers that it was their intention to convey the three tracts to Mrs. Ruth Rogers and Ralph Rogers for $75,101.
Thereafter Mrs. Stanley...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cuba v. Hudson & Marshall, Inc.
...the high bid by letting his hammer fall; immediately after the hammer falls, an irrevocable contract is formed. See Stanley v. Whitmire, 233 Ga. 675, 212 S.E.2d 845 (1975); Tillman v. Dunman, 114 Ga. 406, 409(1), 40 S.E. 244 (1901); Coleman v. Duncan, 540 S.W.2d 935, 937-938 (Mo.Ct.App.1976......
- Gilmer v. Porterfield