Staples v. Kirby Petroleum Co.
Decision Date | 21 February 1923 |
Docket Number | (No. 6659.) |
Citation | 250 S.W. 293 |
Parties | STAPLES, Secretary of State, v. KIRBY PETROLEUM CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Travis County; Geo. Calhoun, Judge.
Proceeding in district court to fix the amount of a franchise tax against the Kirby Petroleum Company a foreign corporation. From a judgment fixing the tax, S. L. Staples, Secretary of State, appeals. Affirmed.
W. A. Keeling, Atty. Gen., and Walace Hawkins and John W. Goodwin, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant.
Andrews, Streetman, Logue & Mobley, of Houston, for appellee.
Findings of Fact.
Appellee is a foreign corporation, chartered under the laws of Delaware. It has been for some time operating in this state, under a permit to do business in this state. Its principal office and place of business in this state is in Houston. It employs its entire capital in this state.
Within the time prescribed by law appellee made a sworn report to the secretary of state, showing the entire value of its authorized capital stock, surplus, and undivided profits to be $9,387,064.08. This is the correct value of all of the property owned by appellee. Appellant refused to issue a permit to appellee to continue business in this state, for the reason he claimed the actual value of the property owned by appellee was not the correct basis upon which to estimate the amount of the franchise tax due by appellee, but that the same should be estimated on the basis of $75,000,000. This contention is based upon the following fact: Appellee was chartered under the laws of Delaware. It is authorized by its charter to issue 75,000 shares of non-par value. That is to say, these so-called shares were units, upon which no value was fixed by the charter, and which the corporation might dispose of at any price it saw proper. The statute of Delaware (Rev. Code 1915, § 1918a, as added by 29 Del. Laws, c. 113, § 3) authorizing the issuance of appellee's charter is as follows:
Appellant, for the purpose of the franchise tax required by the laws of this state, estimated the 75,000 shares of appellee's nonpar stock at $100, each, or $75,000,000.
The judgment of the trial court fixed the amount upon which the franchise tax should be estimated at $9,387,064.08. The trial court further found that the franchise tax owing by appellee was $5,431.75. This is correct if, as a matter of law, the tax should be based upon the valuation of $9,387,064.08, as fixed by the act of 1919.
It is the contention of appellee that the court erred in fixing the rate under the act of 1919, but that the same should be fixed under the act of 1917 (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, art. 7394), for the reason that the act of 1919, in so far as it undertook to change the rate as fixed by the act of 1917, was unconstitutional. Appellant contends that the valuation, for the purpose of the franchise tax due this state, should be fixed at $75,000,000.
Opinion.There is no law in this state authorizing a charter to be granted to a corporation with non-par value of stock, but it is not denied by appellant that a foreign corporation of this character is entitled to obtain a permit to do business in this state, upon the payment of the proper amount of franchise tax. The act of 1919 (General Laws, p. 75 [Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1922, art. 7394]) is not different from the law of 1917 (page 168), except that it provides that the tax shall be computed upon the undivided surplus, in addition to the capital stock, and changes the rate. This latter feature of the act will be dealt with, in a subsequent portion of this opinion.
Section 1 of the act of 1919 reads as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Pierce Petroleum Corporation
... ... v. Sullivan, 282 Mo. 261; State v ... Margay Oil Co., 269 S.W. 63; Detroit Mortgage Co. v ... Sec. of State, 211 Mich. 320; Staples v. Petroleum ... Co., 250 S.W. 293; N. A. Petroleum Co. v ... Hopkins, 105 Kan. 161; Warren v. Bank, 149 Ill ... 25; Insurance Co. v ... ...
-
State v. Pierce Petroleum Corporation
...Car Co. v. Sullivan, 282 Mo. 261; State v. Margay Oil Co., 269 S.W. 63; Detroit Mortgage Co. v. Sec. of State, 211 Mich. 320; Staples v. Petroleum Co., 250 S.W. 293; N.A. Petroleum Co. v. Hopkins, 105 Kan. 161; Warren v. Bank, 149 Ill. 25; Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 179 U.S. 262; U.S. Mortgage......
-
State v. Margay Oil Corporation
...Treasurer of Ohio, 266 U.S. 71. 3. Foreign corporations with non-par stock could be taxed without the act 367. 221 S.W. 728; 181 P. 625; 250 S.W. 293. McCULLOCH, C. J. The appellee in each of these two cases is a foreign corporation whose stock does not express any par value, the stock of e......
-
American Refining Co. v. Staples
...Petroleum Co. v. Hopkins, above; State v. Sullivan, above. The last method was adopted in this state in the case of Staples v. Petroleum Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 293. It is contended by both appellant and appellee that Staples v. Petroleum Company sustains their respective contentions......