Stapleton Studios, LLC v. City of New York
Decision Date | 06 May 2004 |
Docket Number | 2202. |
Citation | 2004 NY Slip Op 03670,7 A.D.3d 273,776 N.Y.S.2d 46 |
Parties | STAPLETON STUDIOS, LLC, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Pursuant to two successive temporary occupancy permits (collectively, the Permit) granted by respondent City of New York, petitioner Stapleton Studios, LLC (Stapleton) operated a start-up film studio on certain city property at "Homeport" in Staten Island. The Permit contained the following provision, set forth in bold capital letters:
Ultimately, the City concluded that it would not proceed with the Stapleton project, based on concerns about whether Stapleton's financial resources were adequate to support a viable film studio, and about the firm's association with a person who had pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud. On or about September 4, 2002, the City served Stapleton with a notice stating that the Permit would not be further renewed after its stated expiration date (October 31, 2002), and directing Stapleton to vacate the Homeport property by that date. In response, Stapleton commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking judicial annulment of the City's decision not to renew the Permit. After joinder of issue, Stapleton made application for leave to conduct discovery pursuant to CPLR 408, and the IAS court, by order entered August 7, 2003, granted such leave to the extent of directing the City to produce specified categories of documents relating to other studio projects with which the City has done business. A Justice of this Court has granted the City leave to appeal from the IAS court's nonfinal order.
We reverse....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People ex rel. James v. N. Leasing Sys., Inc.
...2009] ; Matter of Allocca v. Kelly, 44 A.D.3d 308, 309, 844 N.Y.S.2d 195 [1st Dept. 2007] ; Stapleton Studios, LLC v. City of New York, 7 A.D.3d 273, 274–275, 776 N.Y.S.2d 46 [1st Dept. 2004] ). Discovery is disfavored in a special proceeding and is permitted only on leave of court upon a s......
-
Moody's Corp. v. N.Y. State Dep't of Taxation & Fin.
...to admit is technically available in a special proceeding without leave of court (see CPLR 408 ; Stapleton Studios v. City of New York, 7 A.D.3d 273, 274–275, 776 N.Y.S.2d 46 [2004] ; State of New York ex rel. H. v. P., 90 A.D.2d 434, 427 n. 2, 457 N.Y.S.2d 488 [1982] ), it is generally use......
-
Gonzales v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't
...the single disclosure device available without the court's permission in a special proceeding. C.P.L.R. § 408; Stapleton v. City of New York, 7 A.D.3d 273, 274-75 (1st Dep't 2004). Respondents oppose petitioner's motion as premature, since no disclosure has been conducted to support the pet......
-
People v. N. Leasing Sys., Inc.
...LLC v. Palmer, 52 A.D.3d 236, 236 (1st Dep't 2008); Roth v. Pakstis, 13 A.D.3d 194, 195 (1st Dep't 2004); Stapleton Studios v. City of New York, 7 A.D.3d 273, 274-75 (1st Dep't 2004). See Solangee Z.v. Kahir E., 107 A.D.3d 428, 429 (1st Dep't 2013); Daveiga v. City of New York, 57 A.D.3d 45......