Stapleton v. Monroe

Decision Date08 June 1900
Citation36 S.E. 428,111 Ga. 848
PartiesSTAPLETON et al. v. MONROE et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

1. An absolute and unconditional promissory note cannot be so changed by evidence of a contemporaneous parol agreement as to ingraft upon it a condition. Civ. Code, § 3675.

2. If, in the trial of a case, one party introduce immaterial and illegal evidence without objection, the other party is not thereby entitled to introduce, over objection, other illegal evidence in rebuttal. There can be no equation of errors in the trial of a case. Woolfolk v. State, 8 S.E. 724, 81 Ga. 552.

Error from superior court, Wilcox county; C. C. Smith, Judge.

Action by Lawson Stapleton and others against F. E. Monroe and others. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error. Reversed.

Eldridge Cutts and Hal Lawson, for plaintiffs in error.

Bankston & Cannon, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed.

FISH, J., absent on account of sickness.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT