Stark v. Martin
Decision Date | 29 May 1907 |
Citation | 204 Mo. 433,102 S.W. 1089 |
Parties | STARK et al. v. MARTIN et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Const. art. 6, § 12, provides that appeals shall lie from decisions of the St. Louis Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court, in cases involving title to real estate. Plaintiff alleged that under a written contract it agreed to furnish an owner of land, whereto defendants subsequently acquired title, certain trees, and that to secure the notes given for the trees plaintiff was to have a lien on the land. The petition sought to have the contract declared a first lien and foreclosed. The title was admitted to be in the defendant; the court being called on to determine the mere priority of liens. Held, that the case was not one involving title to real estate, so as to give the Supreme Court jurisdiction on appeal.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Schuyler County.
Action by C. M. Stark and others against Ed. Martin and others. From the judgment, plaintiffs appeal. Case ordered transferred to Kansas City Court of Appeals.
S. W. Mills, John D. Smoot, and Edward E. Campbell, for appellant. C. C. Fogle and Higbee & Mills, for respondent.
This is an action to have declared and enforced a conceived lien, upon 40 acres of land in Schuyler county, and as a basis therefor the following written instrument is pleaded, viz.: This written instrument was duly acknowledged by Jacob Sommer, Jr., on June 2, 1894, and filed for record in the recorder's office of Schuyler county, June 9, 1894.
The prayer of the petition is as follows: "Wherefore plaintiffs pray that they have special judgment for the sum of $160 and interest from the date of the filing of this petition, and that said judgment be made a first lien on the land last described, to wit, the E. ½ of the N. E. ¼ of the N. E. ¼ of section 29, and the W. ½ of the N. W. ¼ of the N. W. ¼, of section 28, all in township 67, range 14, in Schuyler county, Mo., that all equities of redemption be foreclosed, and that said lien be enforced, and that said real estate, or so much thereof as may be necessary to satisfy said judgment, together with costs of suit, be sold, and that a special scire facias be issued thereupon, and for costs, and for general relief."
The petition charges the delivery of the trees as per the written instrument aforesaid, and the planting of the same upon the land in dispute, and a failure to pay the contract price. The petition further charges that, at the date of the written instrument aforesaid, the land was free and clear of incumbrance, except a mortgage of $500 to H. A. Brinkeman, and a second mortgage to Allen Updyke for $200; that Sommer paid both of these mortgages in full October 16, 1895, and the liens thereby created were satisfied upon the margin of the record of said mortgages; that Sommer died November 1, 1895, but prior thereto, and on September 2, 1895, he and his wife executed a deed of trust covering 40 acres of the land in the contract mentioned to the Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company to secure a loan of $350; that in 1897, this deed of trust was foreclosed, and the said 40 acres of land sold to Jacob Gardner for $650; that Gardner afterward conveyed said land to W. N. Enlow and Louis I. Enlow; that they, upon the day of their purchase, executed a deed of trust to the Hill-Dodge Banking Company for $1,075, and also a deed of trust to John C. Mills for $53.75; that the Enlows thereafter conveyed to Ed. Martin. Ed. Martin, John C. Mills, and the Hill-Dodge Banking Company were made defendants.
Defendants Mills and Hill-Dodge Banking Company file their separate answer in these words: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauhey
...67 Mo. 199; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hezel, 138 Mo. 230, 39 S.W. 781; Balz v. Nelson, 171 Mo. 688, 72 S.W. 527; Stark v. Martin, 204 Mo. 439, 102 S.W. 1089; Dubowsky v. Binggeli, 258 Mo. 200, 167 S.W. 999.] A like rule applies when a judgment is sought to be enforced by execution agains......
-
Nettleton Bank v. McGauhey's Estate
...67 Mo. 199; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hezel, 138 Mo. 230, 39 S.W. 781; Balz v. Nelson, 171 Mo. 688, 72 S.W. 527; Stark v. Martin, 204 Mo. 439, 102 S.W. 1089; Dubowsky v. Binggeli, 258 Mo. 200, 167 S.W. A like rule applies when a judgment is sought to be enforced by execution against land......
-
Tant v. Gee
...transfer the case to the Supreme Court. If we do not have jurisdiction of the case we should not pass upon the merits. [Stark v. Martin, 204 Mo. 433, 439, 102 S.W. 1089.] Jurisdiction can neither be waived nor conferred by of parties. This has been decided by our Supreme Court in numerous c......
-
Loewenstein v. Queen Insurance Company
...or establish liens do not involve title to real estate, but they are not in point here. Of such the latest perhaps is Stark v. Martin, 204 Mo. 433, 102 S.W. 1089. In that case Judge Graves said: "Neither by petition nor by the answers is it sought to have even a mortgage or deed of trust ca......