State Carolina v. Towe
| Decision Date | 15 June 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 121PA11.,121PA11. |
| Citation | 365 N.C. 202,709 S.E.2d 599 |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolinav.Patrick Loren TOWE. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERELaura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Towe, Patrick Loren.*600 Phil Berger, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 30th of March 2011 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of June 2011.”
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th of March 2011 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of June 2011.”
Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Lawrence
...plain error because “it [was] highly plausible that the jury could have reached a different result”), disc. rev. allowed, 365 N.C. 202, 709 S.E.2d 599 (2011); State v. Wright, –––N.C.App. ––––, ––––, 708 S.E.2d 112, 121 (holding there was not plain error because “a different result probably......
-
State v. Gettys
...returned a different verdict.' ” (quoting State v. Davis, 321 N.C. 52, 59, 361 S.E.2d 724, 728 (1987))), disc. review allowed, 365 N.C. 202, 709 S.E.2d 599 (2011). This argument is without merit.III. Motion to Dismiss In his second argument, defendant contends that the trial court erred in ......
-
State v. Steen
...739 S.E.2d 869STATE of North Carolinav.George Michael STEEN, Defendant.No. COA121069.Court of Appeals of North Carolina.April 16, 2013 ... [739 S.E.2d 871]Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 28 March 2012 by Judge Robert C. Ervin in Lincoln County Superior ... ...