State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Gulf Ins. Co., 80CA0479

Decision Date16 April 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80CA0479,80CA0479
Citation628 P.2d 182
PartiesSTATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GULF INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. . II
CourtColorado Court of Appeals

Edward V. Frayle and William J. Baum, Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Hall & Evans, Raymond J. Connell and Bonner E. Templeton, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

PIERCE, Judge.

Defendant, Gulf Insurance Co., (Gulf) appeals from the entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff, State Compensation Insurance Fund (Fund). We reverse.

On December 13, 1975, William C. Dean was injured by an uninsured motorist in the course of his employment as a police officer for the City of Boulder. The City of Boulder was insured by Gulf and by the Fund for the injuries suffered by Dean.

Dean elected to receive compensation from the Fund under it's workmen's compensation policy and was paid $11,504.43. Dean subsequently claimed under the uninsured motorist provisions of the Gulf policy and proceeded to arbitration as provided by that policy.

The arbitrator determined that Dean's total damages resulting from the accident amounted to $15,000 and, after deducting the amount received by Dean from the Fund, awarded him $3,495.57. Dean accepted this award and released all other claims against Gulf and there was no appeal from this proceeding.

The Fund then sought a declaratory judgment to determine whether Dean's election to receive compensation benefits, which operated as an assignment to the Fund of Dean's cause of action against the third-party causing his injuries, required Gulf to reimburse the Fund for the $11,504.43 paid to Dean.

The trial court held that § 8-52-108, C.R.S.1973, subrogated the Fund to Dean's rights under Boulder's uninsured motorist policy and entered judgment for the Fund in the amount of $11,504.43.

Gulf contends on appeal that the cited statute does not assign to a workmen's compensation insurance carrier the beneficiary's right to recover from the uninsured motorist carrier. We agree.

Section 8-52-108, C.R.S.1973, provides that if an employee who has been injured by the negligence of a third party elects to take workmen's compensation benefits, the payment of compensation shall operate as an assignment to the Fund of his cause of action against "such other person." The Fund maintains that because Gulf must compensate Dean for damages caused by the uninsured tortfeasor, see § 10-4-319, C.R.S.1973, Gulf essentially steps into the shoes of the tortfeasor for purposes of the assigned cause of action. Thus, the Fund contends, it may pursue its statutory remedy against Gulf as if Gulf were the tortfeasor. We disagree with this contention.

The purpose of the uninsured motorist law is to provide...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Erie Ins. Co. v. Curtis
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 1 Septiembre 1992
    ...State Equip. Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n, 135 Ariz. 477, 479-80, 662 P.2d 152, 154 (Ariz.Ct.App.1983); State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Gulf Ins. Co., 628 P.2d 182, 183-84 (Colo.Ct.App.1981); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Board of Regents, 226 Ga. 310, 311-12, 174 S.E.2d 920, 922 (1970); State F......
  • Dodd v. Middlesex Mut. Assur. Co.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 12 Agosto 1997
    ...Travelers Ins. Co. v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., 252 Ark. 624, 480 S.W.2d 585 (1972); State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Gulf Ins. Co., 628 P.2d 182 (Colo.App.1981); Volk v. Gallopo, 585 So.2d 1163 (Fla.App.1991); State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Board of Regents o......
  • Midland Ins. Co. v. Colatrella
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 28 Marzo 1985
    ...Travelers Ins. Co. v. Nat'l Farmers Union Prop. & Cas. Co., 252 Ark. 624, 480 S.W.2d 585 (Sup.Ct.1972); State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Gulf Ins. Co., 628 P.2d 182, 184 (Colo.Ct.App.1981); State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Univ. Sys. of Georgia Bd. of Regents, 226 Ga. 310, 174 S.E.2d 920, 921......
  • Colorado Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Menor
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 3 Mayo 2007
    ...to the workers' compensation insurer of the employee's cause of action against "such other person." State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Gulf Ins. Co., 628 P.2d 182, 183 (Colo.App.1981). Therefore, § 8-41-203 establishes the workers' compensation insurer's statutory subrogation remedy against a However......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Subrogation: Principles and Practice Pointers
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 20-1, January 1991
    • Invalid date
    ...underinsured motorist coverage, the logic in Kral could void this provision of the UM statute. 63. State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Gulf, 628 P.2d 182 (Colo.App. 1981); State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Commerical Union, 631 P.2d 1168 (Colo.App. 1981). 64. First National Bank of Columbus v. Ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT