State & County Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Macias

Decision Date13 February 2004
Docket NumberNo. 02-0833.,02-0833.
Citation133 S.W.3d 271
PartiesSTATE AND COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Santos MACIAS and Patricia M. Macias.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Robert Lee Galloway, Thompson & Knight LLP, Houston, for State and County Mutual Fire Insurance Company.

David Casso, Flores Casso & Pettitt, Francisco J. Rodriguez, Rodriguez Tovar & De Los Santos, L.L.P., McAllen, for Patricia M. Macias.

Christopher A. Kesler, Bruce B. Kemp, Kemp & Kesler, L.L.P., Sylvia Davidow, George M. Fleming, Anita F. Kawaja, Fleming & Associates, L.L.P., Houston, Keith M. Jensen, Law Office of Keith M. Jensen, P.C., Fort Worth, for Santos Macias.

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue presented for our review in this case is whether State and County Mutual Fire Insurance Company must compensate the Maciases, its insureds, for their vehicle's diminished market value when the car was damaged but fully repaired. The court of appeals held that diminished-value damages were recoverable under the policy, and affirmed the trial court's partial summary judgment and declaratory judgment in favor of the Maciases. 83 S.W.3d 304. In American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schaefer, 124 S.W.3d 154, we held that the Texas Standard Personal Auto Policy, under which the Maciases are insured, does not obligate an insurer to compensate a policyholder for a vehicle's diminished market value when the car has been damaged but adequately repaired. 124 S.W.3d 154. Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and, without hearing oral argument, reverse the court of appeals' judgment and render judgment in favor of State and County Mutual. See TEX.R.APP. P. 59.1.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Culhane v. Western Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 7, 2005
    ...101 S.W.3d 427 (Tenn.Ct.App.2002); Progressive County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 133 S.W.3d 272 (Tex.2004); State & County Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Macias, 133 S.W.3d 271 (Tex.2004); American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schaefer, 124 S.W.3d 154 (Tex.2003); Smither v. Progressive County Mut. Ins. Co.,......
  • City of Houston v. Woods
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 2004
    ... ... from the 80th District Court, Harris County, Carolyn Marks Johnson, J ... [138 S.W.3d 577] ... Fire & Cas. Co. v. Vandewater, 907 S.W.2d 491, 493 n ... State, 78 S.W.2d 254, 256 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1934, ... ...
  • Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America v. Gamez
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 25, 2004
    ... ... The accident occurred in La Paz County, Arizona. The plaintiffs were migrant farm ... as an officer of the court. See Am. Gen. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Vandewater, 907 S.W.2d 491, 493 n ... ad litem in Webb County and across the state. At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing, ... ...
  • Jocson v. Crabb
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • February 13, 2004
    ... ... Gen. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Vandewater, 907 S.W.2d 491, 493 n ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT