State, Dept. of Revenue by and Behalf of Strickler v. Strickler, 97-1549
| Decision Date | 08 December 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-1549,97-1549 |
| Citation | 702 So.2d 277 |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2771 STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE by and on Behalf of Valerie STRICKLER, Appellant, v. Henry STRICKLER, III, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Joseph R. Boyd and William H. Branch of Boyd, Lindsey, Williams & Branch, P.A.; Chriss Walker, Department of Revenue, Office of Child Support Enforcement, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
No appearance, for Appellee.
This appeal arises out of an order finding the father in contempt for failure to pay child support, but reducing his support arrearage. The mother, through the Department of Revenue, contends the trial court erroneously reduced the arrearage. She also contests the amount of the reduction. We reverse.
Unpaid child support payments constitute a vested right which inures to the benefit of the children, and they cannot be cancelled or reduced retrospectively absent extraordinary or compelling circumstances such as waiver, laches, estoppel, or reprehensible conduct on the part of the custodial parent. State, Dep't of Health and Rehabilitative Serv. v. Burns, 654 So.2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The trial court's arrearage reduction was based on the mother's taking dependency exemptions for the parties' children on her 1996 federal income tax return. The final judgment of dissolution granted the father that right. 1 However, the reduction could only have been based on a theory of set-off, an issue never plead, nor noticed, by the father prior to hearing. Since the issue was not tried by consent, the mother was deprived of due process by the trial court's action. See Peterson v. Mathies, 687 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Moreover, there is no record evidence to support the amount of set-off granted, $3,000.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
1 The final judgment provided that the father and mother were to alternate the federal income tax dependency exemptions for their two children. The mother was entitled to claim the exemptions during the odd numbered years, and the father was allowed the exemptions in the even numbered years.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Miles v. Champlin, 1D01-1809.
...Ms. Miles relies on State, Department of Revenue v. Fisher, 738 So.2d 512, 513 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), State, Department of Revenue v. Strickler, 702 So.2d 277, 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), Livingston v. Livingston, 686 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), State, Department of Health and Rehabilita......
-
State, Dept. of Revenue ex rel. Rochell v. Morris
...Department of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., et al. v. Burns, 654 So.2d 1014, 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Department of Revenue et al. v. Strickler, 702 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), nor would the facts in the limited record, a stipulated statement of evidence prepared pursuant to rule 9.......
-
STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Fisher, 98-4434.
...v. Barr, 724 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Livingston v. Livingston, 686 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); State, Dep't of Revenue v. Strickler, 702 So.2d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). In the order on appeal, the trial court made no finding that extraordinary and compelling circumstances were sho......
-
DEPT. OF REV. EX REL. KING v. Blocker, 4D01-1102.
...such as waiver, laches, estoppel, or reprehensible conduct [on the part of the custodial parent]." Dep't of Revenue v. Strickler, III, 702 So.2d 277, 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Also, this Court has held that "[u]npaid child support accruing from an order requiring payment, an arrearage, is a ......