State ex rel. Alford v. Winters

• Decision Date: 19 November 1997
• Docket Number: No. 97-992,97-992
• Parties: The STATE ex rel. ALFORD, Appellant, v. WINTERS, Judge, Appellee.
• Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Page 285

80 Ohio St.3d 285

685 N.E.2d 1242

The STATE ex rel. ALFORD, Appellant, v. WINTERS, Judge, Appellee.

No. 97-992.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1997.

Decided Nov. 19, 1997.

Larry S. Alford, pro se.

Maureen O'Connor, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paul Michael Maric, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. Alford failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C) in commencing his mandamus action. ¹ Alford does not contend that R.C. 2969.25 is inapplicable to mandamus actions. State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 82, 85, 661 N.E.2d 728, 731, quoting R.C. 2731.09 ("Issues of fact raised by the pleadings in mandamus actions 'must be tried, and further proceedings had, in the same manner as in civil actions.' "); cf. Martin v. United States (C.A.7, 1996), 96 F.3d 853, 854 (question of whether mandamus action brought by federal prison inmate constitutes a "civil action" for purposes of federal Prison Litigation Reform Act depends on the circumstances). The court of appeals' dismissal of Alford's complaint was further justified because habeas corpus, rather than mandamus, is the appropriate action for persons claiming entitlement to immediate release from prison. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 186, 188, 677 N.E.2d 347, 349 (affirming dismissal of mandamus complaints filed by inmates).

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., and DOUGLAS, RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, Sr., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

1 R.C. 2969.25 provides:

"(A) At the time that an inmate commences a civil action or appeal against a government entity or employee, the inmate shall file with the court an affidavit that contains a description of each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five years in any state or federal court. The affidavit shall include all of the following for each of those civil actions or appeals:

"(1) A brief description of the nature of the civil action or appeal;

"(2) The case name, case number, and the court in which the civil action or appeal was brought;

"(3) The name of each party to the civil action or appeal;

"(4) The outcome of the civil action or appeal, including whether the court dismissed the civil action or appeal as frivolous or malicious under state or federal law or rule of court, whether the court made an award against the inmate or the inmate's counsel of record for frivolous conduct under section 2323.51 of the Revised Code, another statute, or a rule of court...