State ex rel. Barlow v. Benfield
| Decision Date | 29 March 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 306,306 |
| Citation | 58 S.E.2d 637,231 N.C. 663 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE ex rel. BARLOW et al. v. BENFIELD. |
Martin & Carpenter, Lenoir, for plaintiffs-appellants.
L. M. Abernethy, Granite Falls, and Max C. Wilson, Lenoir, for defendant-appellee.
The judgment of nonsuit was improvidently entered. It was made to appear from the admissions in the answer and the evidence offered by the relators that July 1, 1949, the defendant was elected by the Board of Commissioners of Granite Falls as chief of police of that town, which office he is now holding, and that defendant is not a qualified voter therein. It was also admitted that relators are residents, qualified voters, and taxpayers of Granite Falls.
The office of chief of police of an incorporated town, as Granite Falls is admitted to be, is a public office. Foard v. Hall, 111 N.C. 369, 16 S.E. 420. The relators had a right to institute this action for the cause set out in the complaint. Bouldin v. Davis, 197 N.C. 731, 150 S.E. 507; Midgett v. Gray, 158 N.C. 133, 73 S.E. 791. The statute, G.S. § 160-25, provides that 'No person shall be mayor, commissioner, intendant of police, alderman or other chief officer of any city or town unless he shall be a qualified voter therein.' This statute, said Chief Justice Clark in Foard v. Hall, supra, 'embraces the office of chief of police.' [ 111 N.C. 369, 16 S.E. 422.]
The judgment of nonsuit must be vacated.
Reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Webb v. Cianci
...v. Newark, 74 N.J. Super. 49, 60, 180 A.2d 513, 519 (1962) (citizen has standing in quo warranto); and State ex rel. Barlow v. Benfield, 231 N.C. 663, 664, 58 S.E.2d 637, 637-38 (1950) (residents, qualified voters, and taxpayers have standing in quo The reasons for allowing a private indivi......
-
State v. Hord
...arrests and to execute criminal process, within the town limits, as is vested by law in a sheriff.' The case of State ex rel. Barlow v. Benfield, 231 N.C. 663, 58 S.E.2d 637, was an action in the nature of quo warranto to determine the right of Benfield to hold the office of Chief of Police......
-
Ricks' Will, Matter of
... ... look out for you and take care of you.' The witness was careful to state, however, that 'what transpired ... goes to the formation of my opinion ... ...
-
Klam v. Boehm
...policeman is a public officer, whose duties relate to governmental functions of a municipality. Sec. 19-510 I.C.; State ex rel. Barlow v. Benfield, 231 N.C. 663, 58 S.E.2d 637; Parker v. Travelers' Ins. Co., 174 Ga. 525, 163 S.E. 159, 81 A.L.R. 472. They are employees of the city engaged in......