State ex rel. Bartlett v. Wilcox

Decision Date15 July 1919
Docket NumberCase Number: 10525
Citation182 P. 673,1919 OK 223,75 Okla. 158
PartiesSTATE ex rel. BARTLETT et al. v. WILCOX, Superior Court Judge.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court
Syllabus

¶0 Indians--Allotments--Determination of Heirship--Questions of Fact--Status--Construction--Jurisdiction of Courts.

The power and authority conferred on the county courts by Act of Cong. June 14, 1918, c. 101, 40 Stat. at L. 606 (Comp. Stat. 1918, Append. sec. 4234a), though it involves the exercise by said courts of judicial or quasi judicial power, is not strictly judicial, but is administrative and ministerial, and in determining, pursuant to said act, as a question of fact who are the heirs of any deceased citizen allottee of the Five Civilized Tribes. the court merely finds the facts, and fixes the status, which finding, when material to the question at issue, is conclusive and binding upon the state courts and upon the administrative officers of the national government in determining questions arising under acts of Congress to which it is applicable. The act, however, does not deprive the superior courts of this state of jurisdiction of suits involving lands allotted to an Indian of the Five Civilized Tribes who may die or may have heretofore died leaving restricted Indian heirs, where such suit necessarily includes the determination of the title, and, incidentally, the question of fact as to who are the heirs of said deceased allottee.

Original application for a writ of prohibition by the State, on the relation of H. U. Bartlett and others, against Gaylord R. Wilcox, as Judge of the Superior Court of Creek County, to restrain him from hearing a pending cause. Writ denied.

John B. Meserve, Charles O'Connor, W. L. Ronson, and McDougal, Lytle, Allen & Pryor, for relators.

Jones & Foster, for respondent.

RAINEY, J.

¶1 This is an original application to this court for a writ of prohibition to Hon. Gaylord R. Wilcox, as judge of the superior court of Creek county, Okla., to restrain him from proceeding with the hearing of a certain cause pending in the superior court of Creek county, entitled Jackson R. Dunzy et al. v. H. U. Bartlett et al. The case was regularly instituted in said court, the nature of the action being one to quiet title to certain real estate situated wholly in Creek county, to partition the same among the several parties entitled thereto, and to cancel as a cloud upon plaintiff's title a certain deed executed by one of the plaintiffs to the defendant, Bartlett, and for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite to preserve the estate, from which it is alleged large quantities of oil and gas are being taken and converted by one of the defendants.

¶2 Prior to the institution of said action in the superior court of Creek county, Congress passed Act June 14, 1918, c. 101, 40 Stat. L. 606 (Comp. St. 1918, Append. sec. 4234a) entitled:

"An act to provide for a determination of heirship in cases of deceased members of the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Knight v. Carter Oil Co. (In re Fulsom's Estate)
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • December 17, 1929
    ...the facts therein presented, in the following cases: State ex rel. Miller v. Huser, 76 Okla. 130, 184 P. 113; State ex rel. Bartlett et al. v. Wilcox, 75 Okla. 158, 182 P. 673; Homer v. Lester, 95 Okla. 284, 219 P. 392; Owens v. Kitchens, 105 Okla. 88 232 P. 797; Arnold v. Willis, 105 Okla.......
  • State v. Wilcox
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • July 15, 1919
    ...182 P. 673 75 Okla. 158, 1919 OK 223 STATE ex rel. BARTLETT et al. v. WILCOX, Superior Court Judge. No. 10525.Supreme Court of OklahomaJuly 15, 1919 ...          Syllabus ... by the ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT