State ex rel. Brooks v. Zakaib
Decision Date | 23 June 2003 |
Docket Number | No. 31042.,31042. |
Citation | 214 W.Va. 253,588 S.E.2d 418 |
Parties | STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Richard BROOKS, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Paul ZAKAIB, Jr., Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, Respondent. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Mary McQuain, Esq., Stuart Calwell, Esq., Law Offices of Stuart Calwell, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for the Petitioner.
The Honorable Paul Zakaib, Jr., Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, Charleston, West Virginia, Pro Se.
Chanin Wolfingbarger Krivonyak, Esq., James D. McQueen, Jr., Esq., McQueen, Harmon & Murphy, L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for the Respondent, Rakesh Wahi, M.D.
Robert P. Fitzsimmons, Esq., Russell Jay Guthrie, Esq., Fitzsimmons Law Offices, Wheeling, West Virginia, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae, Robert P. Fitzsimmons.
J. Michael Benninger, Esq., Paul T. Farrell, Jr., Esq., Wilson, Frame, Benninger & Metheney, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae, West Virginia Trial Lawyers Association.
Richard D. Jones, Esq., Michelle L. Barker, Esq., Flaherty, Sensabaugh & Bonasso, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for the Respondent, Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
William S. Druckman, Esq., Madonna C. Estep, Esq., Salsbery & Druckman, Charleston, West Virginia, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae, Salsbery & Druckman.
James C. Peterson, Esq., Hill, Peterson, Carper, Bee & Deitzler, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, Attorney for Amici Curiae, James C. Peterson and Hill, Peterson, Carper, Bee & Deitzler, P.L.L.C. DAVIS, Justice:
The petitioner herein, Richard Brooks [hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Brooks"], requests this Court to issue a writ of prohibition1 against the respondent herein, the Honorable Paul Zakaib, Jr., Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. Specifically, Mr. Brooks desires this Court to prevent the circuit court from enforcing its December 18, 2002, order whereby it sealed certain documents, from a related matter, that Mr. Brooks' counsel had obtained from the Circuit Court of Grant County pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request.2 Upon a review of the parties' briefs, appendices, and arguments herein, we grant as moulded the requested writ. To the extent that the peer review documents contained in the Grant County jury trial record (1)(a) are available from an original source other than the peer review process or (b) are no longer protected by said privilege as a result of Dr. Wahi's waiver thereof and (2) have not been sealed by that tribunal, the petitioner may access such documents and make use thereof in his medical malpractice action against Dr. Wahi and CAMC. See generally W. Va.Code § 30-3C-3 (1980) (Repl.Vol.1998). Whether or not such documents are exempt from the privilege or were sealed by the Grant County Circuit Court must be determined by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County.
The lengthy and complex factual and procedural posture upon which the instant original jurisdiction proceeding is based may be summarized as follows. In 1995, Mr. Brooks sustained serious injuries in a motor vehicle accident and was transported to Charleston Area Medical Center [hereinafter referred to as "CAMC"] to receive medical treatment. In the course of said treatment, Dr. Wahi surgically repaired a tear in Mr. Brooks' aorta. During post-operative care, it became apparent that Mr. Brooks could not move his lower extremities and that, either as a result of his traumatic injuries or the surgery he had undergone, he had been rendered a T-6 paraplegic. Thereafter, Mr. Brooks obtained counsel and, on January 10,1997, instituted a medical malpractice action against Dr. Wahi and CAMC in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County.
Shortly after the incidents described above, Dr. Wahi left CAMC and moved to Grant County, West Virginia. At approximately the same time, CAMC undertook a peer review investigation of Dr. Wahi, due, in part, to the unfortunate outcome of Mr. Brooks' surgery and as a result of the unanticipated surgical outcomes of other patients treated by Dr. Wahi.3 After the conclusion of such peer review proceedings, an article was published in the Charleston Gazette newspaper which allegedly re-printed verbatim the contents of certain peer review documents in spite of the privilege that usually attaches to such records.4 In response to this article, Dr. Wahi filed a defamation action, in the Circuit Court of Grant County, against the Daily Gazette Company and CAMC claiming that the published information questioning his skill as a cardiothoracic surgeon jeopardized his ability to practice medicine in this State.
During the course of the Grant County proceedings, both Dr. Wahi and CAMC5 introduced into evidence the peer review documents alleged to have been divulged in the newspaper article; these documents, as well as other peer review records, were also admitted into evidence by the circuit court and published to the jury. Ultimately, the jury concluded that Dr. Wahi had not proven the elements of his defamation claim and ruled in favor of the remaining defendant, CAMC. Although the peer review documents placed in evidence in support of the parties' respective positions were ostensibly protected by the peer review privilege following the conclusion of the jury trial,6 there is no evidence before this Court to indicate that any party made a written motion to seal the record of the trial proceedings or that the Circuit Court of Grant County issued a written order placing such record under seal. Although not apparent from the party's appendices in the instant proceeding, Dr. Wahi and CAMC nevertheless maintain that the Circuit Court of Grant County sealed the subject trial record by verbal order.
(Citations omitted).
As a result, copies of both the jury trial exhibits and electronic recordings of the proceedings were forwarded to Mr. Brooks' counsel, who had said recordings transcribed by another certified court reporter.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Co.
... ... court ruling that admits evidence must be timely made and must state the specific ground of the objection, if the specific ground is not ... State ex rel. Cooper v. Caperton, 196 W.Va. 208, 470 S.E.2d 162 (1996). We have ... State ex rel. Brooks" v. Zakaib, 214 W.Va. 253, 267, 588 S.E.2d 418, 432 (2003). \xC2" ... ...
-
Newark Ins. Co. v. Brown
... ... will not enact a meaningless or useless statute.' Syllabus Point 4, State ex rel. Hardesty v. Aracoma-Chief Logan No. 4523, Veterans of Foreign Wars ... 925, 160 L.Ed.2d 813 (2005). See also State ex rel. Brooks v. Zakaib, 214 W.Va. 253, 264-65, 588 S.E.2d 418, 429-30 (2003) ... ...
-
State ex rel. Wheeling Hosp., Inc. v. Wilson
... ... pt. 4, State ex rel. Brooks v. Zakaib, 214 W.Va. 253, 588 S.E.2d 418 (2003). Furthermore, we have recognized that the definition of "review organization," itself, provides ... ...
-
Helton v. Reed
... 638 S.E.2d 160 ... Virgil T. HELTON, State Tax Commissioner of the State of West Virginia, Petitioner Below, ... error prohibited consideration of Commissioner's appeal); State ex rel. Clark v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of W. Va., Inc., 195 W.Va. 537, 466 ... 733, 619 S.E.2d 246, 255 (2005). See also State ex rel. Brooks v. Zakaib, 214 W.Va. 253, 264-65, 588 S.E.2d 418, 429-30 (2003) ... ...