State ex rel. Campbell v. Bd. of Police Comm'rs of St. Louis

Decision Date31 October 1885
CitationState ex rel. Campbell v. Bd. of Police Comm'rs of St. Louis, 88 Mo. 144 (Mo. 1885)
PartiesTHE STATE ex rel. CAMPBELL v. THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LOUIS, Appellants.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1. Power of Police Commissioners.

The power of the police commissioners to appoint a chief of police “for such time as the board may determine,” does not include the power to discharge and appoint a chief of police at their pleasure.

2. ______.

An appointment of a chief of police without specifying the duration of the term is not void, and the commissioners cannot remove such an appointee at their pleasure.

3. ______.

A chief of poliee cannot be removed by the commissioners before the expiration of his term of office, except for specified causes.

4. Chief of Police: TERM OF OFFICE.

The statutory limitation of the term of office of a chief of police is four years where the term of his tenure is not otherwise fixed by the order of his appointment.

5. ______: PRESUMPTIONS: CERTIORARI.

In proceedings by certiorari, it will not be presumed from a record which shows merely the removal of an officer that such removal was for cause shown.

6. Practice.

In such a proceeding such a record will be quashed.a1

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

Leverett Bell and C. H. Krum for appellants.

C. F. Joy and J. G. Chandler for respondent.

HENRY, C. J.

We are satisfied with the conclusion reached by the court of appeals, viz., that the board could not remove Campbell, the chief of police, except for cause. The statute requires the board, when it appoints a chief, to fix the term for which he shall hold the office, and provides that he can only be removed for cause; and the board cannot evade the latter provision, either by neglecting or purposely omitting, to determine the period for which he shall hold the office. To concede to the board such authority would enable them to designate a term of office not warranted by the law, by...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • State ex rel. Hammond v. Maxfield
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 24 Diciembre 1942
    ... ... Mayor , 92 N.Y. 427; State ex ... rel. Goodnow v. Police Comm'rs 184 Mo. 109, ... 71 S.W. 215; Fitzsimmons v. O'Neill , ... R. A. 791; Honey v. Graham , 39 ... Tex. 1; Hallgren v. Campbell , 82 Mich. 255, ... 46 N.W. 381, 9 L. R. A. 408, 21 Am. St. Rep. 557; ... ...
  • The State ex rel. Hawes v. Mason
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 1899
    ... ... established law that the State has the power to impose a ... police force upon its municipalities, and compel their ... support out of the ... 481; State ex ... rel. v. County Court of St. Louis County, 34 Mo. 546; ... Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel., 15 Md ... argument. [State ex rel. Police Commrs. v. County Court, 34 ... Mo. 546.] ...          The Act ... of ... construed by this court in State ex rel. Campbell ... [153 Mo. 35] v. Board of Police Commissioners, 88 ... Mo. 144, ... ...
  • State ex rel. Hamilton v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 7 Marzo 1924
    ...393; State ex rel. Gilmur v. Seattle, 83 Wash. 93; 1 Dillon on Mun. Corp. (5 Ed.) sec. 397; State ex rel. v. Police Comrs., 14 Mo.App. 297, 88 Mo. 144. They therefore hold until removed for after notice and hearing. Gracey v. St. Louis, 213 Mo. 384, 394; State ex rel. v. Maroney, 191 Mo. 53......
  • The State At Relation of Bixman v. Denton
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 27 Enero 1908
    ... ... 507; McCullough v. Large, 20 F ... 309; State ex rel. v. Riley, 203 Mo. 175, 101 S.W ... 567; R. S. 1899, sec ... Kansas City, 89 Mo. 34; State ex rel. v ... Police Com., 88 Mo. 144; State ex rel. v ... Court, 80 Mo. 500; ... State ex rel. v. Campbell, 37 Mo.App. 338; State ... ex rel. v. County Court, 47 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free