State ex rel. Carr v. Akron, 2006-0168.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Ohio |
| Citation | 2006 Ohio 3863,852 N.E.2d 185,110 Ohio St.3d 1428-1451 |
| Docket Number | 2006-0168. |
| Parties | STATE EX REL. CARR v. AKRON. |
| Decision Date | 02 August 2006 |
v.
AKRON.
In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry, relators shall file their brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence, respondent shall file its brief within 20 days after the filing of relators' brief, and relators may file a reply brief within seven days after the filing of respondent's brief.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 practice notes
-
State ex rel. Carr v. Akron, 2006-0168.
...analyses. {¶ 28} We granted an alternative writ, and the parties submitted evidence and briefs. 110 Ohio St.3d 1435, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 185. The Ohio Municipal League and the cities of Euclid, North Ridgeville, Dublin, Upper Arlington, Parma, and Lakewood filed an amicus curiae brie......
1 cases
-
State ex rel. Carr v. Akron, 2006-0168.
...analyses. {¶ 28} We granted an alternative writ, and the parties submitted evidence and briefs. 110 Ohio St.3d 1435, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 185. The Ohio Municipal League and the cities of Euclid, North Ridgeville, Dublin, Upper Arlington, Parma, and Lakewood filed an amicus curiae brie......