State ex rel. Citizens' Bar Ass'n v. Gagliardo, 77-1393
Decision Date | 12 July 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 77-1393,77-1393 |
Citation | 378 N.E.2d 153,55 Ohio St.2d 70 |
Parties | , 9 O.O.3d 74 The STATE ex rel. CITIZENS' BAR ASSOCIATION et al., Appellants, v. GAGLIARDO, Judge, et al., Appellees. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
On October 3, 1977, appellants, Citizens' Bar Association and two of its members, Thomas W. Lippitt and Martha I. Lippitt, filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, seeking to compel Judge John J. Toner, clerk of the Juvenile Division of the Court of Common Pleas, to allow appellants to inspect the financial disclosure statement there on file of Judge Angelo J. Gagliardo of the Juvenile Division of that court.
Appellants contend that this disclosure statement is a public record and thus available for inspection. Appellants contend further that respondent Judge Gagliardo is required by Canon 6 of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct to file a financial disclosure statement with the clerk of the court where he serves, and that the clerk, respondent Judge Toner, has custody of such statement and must provide a copy, at cost, to the public.
On October 12, 1977, appellees filed a motion to dismiss, which was granted on October 19, 1977.
The cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.
Thomas W. Lippitt, pro se.
John T. Corrigan, Pros. Atty., and Mary A. Lentz, Columbus, for appellees.
R.C. 149.43 states in part:
In State ex rel. Beauty Supply Co. v. State Bd. of Cosmetology (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 245, 246, 361 N.E.2d 444, 445, this court stated:
(Emphasis added.)
R.C. 102.02 requires Judge Gagliardo to file a financial disclosure statement with the secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. Thus, that statement so filed is a "public record" pursuant to R.C. 149.43. As such, it is subject to public inspection at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Plain Dealer Pub. Co. v. Lesak
...kept by a governmental unit. Second, the records must be specifically required to be kept by law. State, ex rel. Citizens' Bar Assn., v. Gagliardo (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 70, 378 N.E.2d 153 ; State, ex rel. Beauty Supply Co., v. State Bd. of Cosmetology (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 245, 361 N.E.2d 4......
-
State ex rel. Mothers Against Drunk Drivers v. Gosser
...ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., v. Lesak (1984), 9 Ohio St.3d 1, 2, 457 N.E.2d 821, citing State, ex rel. Citizens Bar Assn., v. Gagliardo (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 70, 378 N.E.2d 153 , and interpreting R.C. 149.43. Also, in Dayton Newspapers v. Dayton (1976), 45 Ohio St.2d 107, 341 N.E.2d......
-
State, ex rel. Harmon v. Bender
...a duty imposed by law * * *.' " State v. Brooks (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 144, 147, 271 N.E.2d 869 ; State, ex rel. Citizens' Bar Assn., v. Gagliardo (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 70, 71, 378 N.E.2d 153 R.C. 149.43(B) mandated public access to public records and stated in pertinent part: "All public re......
- State ex rel. Bennett v. Lime