State ex rel. City of Algoma v. Peterson
Decision Date | 10 February 1942 |
Citation | 2 N.W.2d 253,239 Wis. 599 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. CITY OF ALGOMA v. PETERSON. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Door County; Henry A. Detling, Judge.
Affirmed.
This action was begun on March 26, 1940, by the State of Wisconsin ex rel. City of Algoma, plaintiff, against P. M. Peterson, defendant, to enjoin the erection of a gasoline station upon the premises thereinafter described, on the ground that it would when erected constitute a public nuisance. There was a trial by the court. The court found against the plaintiff and judgment was entered on February 11, 1941, adjudging that the erection of a gasoline station on the premises in question would not constitute a public nuisance; that plaintiff is not entitled to an injunction enjoining the defendant from constructing and operating a filling station at the point in question; that the temporary injunction should be dissolved and that the defendant have his costs and disbursements, and providing also for the assessment of damages. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The facts will be stated in the opinion.
S. Knudson, of Algoma, and W. E. Wagener, of Sturgeon Bay, for appellant.
Verne C. Lewellen, of Green Bay, for respondent.
One phase of this controversy was before this Court in a prior action and is reported in City of Algoma v. Peterson, 1939, 233 Wis. 82, 288 N.W. 809. Upon the former appeal the merits were not reached for the reason that the city was held to be without power to bring the action and the complaint was dismissed. Thereupon the city council authorized the commencement of the present action. The first action was commenced July 11, 1938. An interim zoning ordinance was passed by the City of Algoma on August 5, 1938. A permanent zoning ordinance was passed by the City of Algoma June 8, 1939. Both ordinances deny the right to construct a gasoline filling station at the point in question.
The physical situation is best disclosed by reference to Exhibit 3, reproduced herewith:
IMAGE
The defendant commenced the erection of the filling station the latter part of June, 1938. In the first action an injunction preventing the defendant from proceeding further was issued on July 11, 1938. At the time the injunction was served, the defendant had removed a two row cedar hedge, four feet high and two or three feet in width, completely fronting the property on both Fourth Street and Lake Street, excavations had been made and two one-thousand gallon tanks each ten feet long and five feet in diameter had been buried on the premises, a concrete abutment had been erected and two gasoline pumps ten feet apart had been placed thereon. Piping connecting the tanks with the pumps had been installed and gasoline had been placed in the tanks ready for operation. A building twelve feet by fourteen feet by nine feet high was contemplated but no actual work on its erection had been done.
The court found the following facts:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. American Oil Co. v. Bessent
...that the exclusion of a business from an area needed a basis akin to a nuisance has been abandoned, State ex rel. City of Algoma v. Peterson (1942), 239 Wis. 599, 2 N.W.2d 253, nor is the police power in respect to comprehensive zoning to be exercised only in cases of absolute necessity. Th......
- Rhyner v. Hartl